Skip to comments.
COULTER RIPS MAG PHOTO 'DISTORTION'
The Drudge Report ^
| April 18, 2005
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 04/18/2005 9:09:12 AM PDT by MisterRepublican
"Why can't they just photograph conservatives straight?!" blasted this week's TIME magazine covergirl Ann Coulter.
The bestselling author and controversialist slammed magazine editors for fronting a photo of her, she claims, which is so distorted "my own mother would not even recognize me!"
The photographer, Platon, appears to have used a wide "Fisheye" lense for the cover snap, stretching Coulter's legs and feet -- while shrinking the rest of her body.
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; liberalelites; mediabias; timemag; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-178 next last
To: MisterRepublican
"Why can't they just photograph conservatives straight?!Because their seething hatred knows no bounds. There's no such thing as fairness in their world. Their biased ideology rules over them like an iron fist.
121
posted on
04/18/2005 10:44:17 AM PDT
by
Bullish
To: killjoy
I like the photo also, a classy lady on an equally classy
Mies van der Rohe Barcelona chair.
To: MisterRepublican
Waaaahhhhh, I don't like my photo. The mean ol' press is betaing up on me. Waaahhhhhh.....
To: MisterRepublican
When I saw it, I thought of Alice in Wonderland.
124
posted on
04/18/2005 10:55:04 AM PDT
by
sandbar
To: CedarDave
At least her legs are tastefully crossed unlike Clinton's pose. I think I'd rather see her legs in the position Clinton had his.... :-)
To: k2blader
IF she gripes about it, she gets even more publicity, ala Drudge carrying it as the lead today. Hence, she gripes about it.
To: MisterRepublican
Sorry, Ann, but the mistake is yours. You posed for them, you had to know they'd mess with you somehow. Next time, make'm use a file photo. It might be twisted just as badly, but at least you won't be a partner to it.
127
posted on
04/18/2005 11:03:17 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(John Paul the Great, pray for the Conclave. Holy Spirit, make Your will known.)
To: MisterRepublican
She's a conservative. She must be humiliated somehow.
They cannot be expected to use a nice looking photo of her.
Do you think they would ever do this to Hillary though?
Not on your life!
To: MisterRepublican
![](http://i.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1999/1101990301_400.jpg)
They should have showed Hillary's fat ankles.
She got an artist's treatment designed to make her look good.
To: MisterRepublican
Then of course there's this photo:
She never looked better of course. It's heavily retouched to make her look better than real life.
I'll just have to keep on reapeating... there is no left-wing media bias...
To: KeyesPlease
LOL! Well, since Ann is about six feet tall, she doesn't need to wear them anyway. The pointy toe is really only beneficial for short chicks like me who try to convince themselves and everyone else we're an inch or three taller than we actually are! :)
131
posted on
04/18/2005 11:15:26 AM PDT
by
exnavychick
(There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
To: Natchez Hawk
"Oh Wah...wah...wah...b****...b****...b****" Really sweetheart, Don't sit for an interview and pose for a shot with some rag for self-promotion and then pull the same ol' aw shucks-- 'Them clever liberals fooled me' I mean really people, a little personal responsibility
That's what gets me too. If she hates the liberal media so much, why is she participating in it? She apparently wants it both ways...
To: MisterRepublican
Ann Coulter cleaning a grease trap in jeans and a tee-shirt would still look better than anything the left of center crowd could trot out. I know this is going to sound bizarre, but her beauty comes from deep inside. She is a REAL person, and having a fully functional brain doesn't hurt either.
Regards,
GtG
133
posted on
04/18/2005 11:24:15 AM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, but I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: ChildOfThe60s
>>>Go to the TIME cover archive and look at the the times the Hildabeast has been on it. Very flattering photography of he majesty, which should come as no surprise. 8 covers. Sycophants. >>>
Yes, they make the witch out to be Betty Crocker and get very unflattering photo for the conservative.
134
posted on
04/18/2005 11:32:03 AM PDT
by
sandbar
To: BullDog108
How soft and sweet she looks with a little meat on her bones.
135
posted on
04/18/2005 11:36:56 AM PDT
by
sandbar
To: MisterRepublican
136
posted on
04/18/2005 11:44:14 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: sandbar
That was before all the cigarettes and chardonnay!
137
posted on
04/18/2005 11:45:12 AM PDT
by
BullDog108
("Conservatives believe in God. Liberals think they are God." ---Ann Coulter)
To: MisterRepublican
Maybe, they should have shown her "package"
Bigger than any of the pubbie sinators or reps!
To: Bon mots
To Hillery at #129!
Look at that pose! It just beckons all to be drawn into her V.
For the children doncha' know!
To: MisterRepublican
"There is no such thing as bad publicity."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-178 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson