Posted on 04/17/2005 10:45:46 AM PDT by Pikamax
SOUTH WINDSOR -- Four high school students were sent home Friday after they wore T-shirts bearing anti-homosexual slogans to school, causing a series of disturbances as other students became "emotionally distraught," students and school officials said. The boys, who wore white T-shirts on which they had written, "Adam and Eve, Not Adam and Steve," say their constitutional right to free speech has been violated.
Advertisement
"We were just voicing our opinions," said Steven Vendetta, who made the T-shirts with his friends, Kyle Shinfield, David Grimaldi, and another student who asked not to be identified. "We didn't tell other people to think what we're thinking. We just told them what we think."
But other students say they felt threatened by the shirts, which also quoted Bible verses pertaining to homosexuality.
"I didn't feel safe at this school today," said Diana Rosen, who is co-president of the school's Gay-Straight Alliance.
Vendetta said the impetus for the T-shirts came earlier in the week, when students at the high school took part in the annual Day of Silence, a project orchestrated by the national Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. On the Day of Silence, students across the country do not speak, as a reminder of the discrimination and harassment experienced by homosexuals.
Students at the high school also wore signs showing their support for legislation that would recognize civil unions for same-sex couples in Connecticut, Vendetta said.
Vendetta and his friends, who oppose civil unions, wanted to make their feelings known.
"We felt if they could voice their opinions for it, we could voice our opinion against it," he said. "There is another side to this debate, and we're representing it."
Almost immediately, the shirts drew comment and debate from other students, Vendetta said.
"I walked down the hall, and people were either cheering me on, yelling at me, or just sneering," he said. "It was the most intense experience."
Teachers brought the situation to the attention of high school Principal John DiIorio, who said Friday that the law protects students' freedom of speech, as long as that speech doesn't disrupt the educational process.
He told the boys they could continue to wear the shirts as long as they didn't become a distraction to others.
The students returned to class. But heated arguments and altercations ensued almost immediately, with some students becoming "very emotional," said student Sam Etter.
Rosen said that when she first saw the shirts, she "almost didn't believe it." She became very upset, crying and spending most of the day in administrators' and guidance counselor's offices. She also got into several arguments, she said.
"I saw a large crowd gathered during one of our lunch waves," said senior William "B.J." Haun. "A large debate was going on. It involved a lot of people. By the end of the day, everyone was talking about it and giving their two cents."
Eventually, DiIorio called the boys into the office and told them that other students were becoming "emotionally distraught," Shinfield said. He then asked the boys to remove the shirts. They refused and were sent home.
DiIorio said no disciplinary action has been taken against them.
Shinfield, who says he believes "the choice to become homosexual is against the will of God," says he doesn't regret what he did.
"If we took the shirts off, it ruined the whole point of wearing them," he said. "I wouldn't have been able to deal with my conscience. This topic is really important to me."
But he added that he didn't intend to hurt other students' feelings.
"It upset me that people took it personally," he said.
Alex Goldberg, a member of the Gay-Straight Alliance, said his classmates have a right to their opinions but took it too far.
"School is supposed to be a safe zone for everyone," he said. "It's crossing the line when you target other people."
Now I've gotten a dang earworm -- "Feelings...........
CHRISTIAN does not mean demented !!! ;-))
". . .I didn't FEEL safe. . ."
=======
Well, I've never seen her, but I'll bet she doesn't LOOK safe either. Heh heh heh (dirty laugh) !!! ;-))
Well stated, but the problem is that education is not the primary goal of school administrators. School administrators are generally all cut from the same cloth - they tend to be petty tyrants, who prefer order above all else, and if forced to choose between order and education, they will choose order every single time.
On the "Day of Silence" how do they conduct classes; and is it mandatory that everyone not speak?
P.S. Isn't someone who wants to FEEL safe the same someone who picks the lock on the steel box that holds your valuables ??? ;-))
Did these boys threaten anyone verbally?
I don't think so; if a T-shirt could make one feel unsafe, that person is certifiably insane.
Well stated, but the problem is that education is not the primary goal of school administrators. School administrators are generally all cut from the same cloth - they tend to be petty tyrants, who prefer order above all else, and if forced to choose between order and education, they will choose order every single time.
Too true. They also care a great deal more about avoiding Bad Publicity than about avoiding poor education.
A "Day of Silence" isn't a distraction? How does anything get done on that day?
So if any number of straight students became emotionally distraught at the position taken by the gay students, the gay students would have to surrender their right to freedom of expression? Is that how it works?
That's right. Obviously, the staff can't control the school. Everyone should feel "unsafe" if that's the situation.
And the school officials in this school couldn't maintain an environment conducive to education. They should have sent everyone involved home.
When the students who disagreed with civil-unions expressed their opinions, the students who favored civil-unions suddenly felt "unsafe." Why?
Which group first became vocal and unreasonable? Why?
Logic dictates that the students who were being disruptive and hostile should have been sent home. But, don't expect logic and maturity to be displayed by public school officials. It is much easier to take the easy way out and suppress the rights of one group over another.
More fallout from the foul "Day of Silence"/couldn't they PLEASE make it the "Decade of Silence"?
When I read stuff like this:
"I didn't feel safe at this school today," said Diana Rosen, who is co-president of the school's Gay-Straight Alliance.
I feel as though I seriously need to throw up.
Let DirtyHarryY2K and me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
I hope everyone who reads this clearly understands clearly that the purpose of public screwels is to turn the next generation into fools, deviants, and sheep.
And I (addign my personal touche) would HAVE to ad to the back:
"...But that doesn't mean I don't own a gun!"
PING
""I saw a large crowd gathered during one of our lunch waves," said senior William "B.J." Haun. "A large debate was going on. It involved a lot of people. By the end of the day, everyone was talking about it and giving their two cents.""
As if talking about and giving their two cents is a "bad thing". How dare those kids learn to discuss issues and think for themselves.
> Rosen said that when she first saw the shirts, she "almost didn't believe it." She became very upset, crying and spending most of the day in administrators' and guidance counselor's offices. <
Wahhhhh! She couldn't believe she would see a contrary opinion in a government school.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.