Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ken21; wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; ...

Jeffrey Rosen

Bruce Gilden/Magnum, for The New York Times
Chip Mellor, Institute for Justice.

Bruce Gilden/Magnum, for The New York Times
Michael Greve, American Enterprise Institute.

Bruce Gilden/Magnum, for The New York Times
Richard Epstein, University of Chicago.

This is a long and informative articlce about the judiciary since FDR. It's pretty fair even though it's written by a lefty, IIRC.

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

42 posted on 04/18/2005 6:23:33 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping.


43 posted on 04/18/2005 6:56:56 PM PDT by duck duck goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

the photos of the conservatives seemed offensive to me.

it was as if the nyt did what the media always does, take several hundred fast shots, and chose the least attractive of the lot for the conservatives.


45 posted on 04/18/2005 7:08:58 PM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; ken21

Thanks for the ping, neverdem, and for posting this, ken21.

Do all those people in the photographs *want* to look like it's 1937, again? Can we just make it wishful thinking?

There is, as Robert George has noticed, a "Clash of Orthodoxies." Some of us see nothing wrong with overturning laws which are based on penumbras and emanations, while others are just as accepting of the devining of such.

Life, liberty, and property - in that order, and as "First principles" - are the only ligitimate concerns of a legitimate government, especially at the Federal level. If a legislature or a judiciary cannot find a basis for a law in these three, then the law is not a legitimate Federal matter.

But, of course, everyone should agree with my interpretation of "Life, liberty, and property" before they start action. (grin)

One issue is the activism - and the definition of "activism." I've read comments that seem to imply that there is a difference of opinion between Thomas and Scalia on what constitutes "originalism" and activism. I'm still deciding which side of that fine line I'm on. With my primary concern being the first of the First Principles, I may tend toward what Scalia, and this author most certainly would, consider activism.


48 posted on 04/18/2005 11:59:26 PM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

bump and thanks!


50 posted on 04/19/2005 12:25:47 AM PDT by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

the posted picture of richard epstein looks quite unlike the one on his website: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/epstein/


68 posted on 05/16/2005 9:50:11 AM PDT by NormanCjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson