Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANN COULTER TO BE ON COVER OF TIME MAGAZINE ACCORDING TO NEW DRUDGE
Drudge Report ^ | 04/17/05 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 04/17/2005 3:58:47 AM PDT by RaceBannon

Ann Coulter to be on copverof Time Magazine according to new Drudge Report


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ann; anncoulter; cary; coulter; timemag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-355 next last
To: hosepipe
She is a "polemicist" in the true Greek meaning of the word (it means "combatant"). She combats with her words. That is fine. That appeals to certain segment of people.

The kind of articles that turn me on are analytical ones that get me to think. George Will is one such writer. There are other less stuffy ones but I can't remember them right now.

I prefer analytical over polemicist.

161 posted on 04/17/2005 11:19:53 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Destro
She advocated converting the Middle East to Christianity - sure I would love that, but it is not going to happen until Jesus returns.

She said we SHOULD, which you just agreed with, so I don't see your problem.

162 posted on 04/17/2005 11:25:21 AM PDT by alnick (Rice 2005: We've only just begun to see what Freedom can achieve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
I find her very entertaining and provocative but I also believe she is considered a 'bomb thrower' by the middle (if there is a middle?). Laura, on the other hand, comes from a lawyer background and likes to engage the other side by drawing them in before she smacks them up side the head. I like that.

I think we need both of them. Each does her "job" well. :-)

163 posted on 04/17/2005 11:26:29 AM PDT by alnick (Rice 2005: We've only just begun to see what Freedom can achieve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: alnick
She is a "polemicist" in the true Greek meaning of the word (it means "combatant"). She combats with her words. That is fine. That appeals to certain segment of people. The kind of articles that turn me on are analytical ones that get me to think. George Will is one such writer. There are other less stuffy ones but I can't remember them right now.

I prefer analytical over polemicist.

164 posted on 04/17/2005 11:26:57 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
One must stroll away from convention to understand Ann's message-within-a-message style. Ann is a giver. She is giving the left back everything they have been giving a getting away with since at least television became popular. The only extra she throws in is a smile.

Oh, that and truth. :o)

165 posted on 04/17/2005 11:27:30 AM PDT by alnick (Rice 2005: We've only just begun to see what Freedom can achieve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Very cool photo.


166 posted on 04/17/2005 11:28:50 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Hand em their arse

In case you missed the most recent ping:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385401/posts


167 posted on 04/17/2005 11:31:15 AM PDT by hattend (Thinking up a new tagline...please stand by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Very cool photo.


168 posted on 04/17/2005 11:32:00 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: hattend

Thanks Hattend!!! AmishDude pinged me to it, hysterical!!!! I have the feeling I'll be looking for his columns quite often... And by the way, I am waiting with baited breath for your new tagline... :^)


169 posted on 04/17/2005 11:33:30 AM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Very cool photo.


170 posted on 04/17/2005 11:34:01 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Thank you RaceBannon! FReepers need to stop putting her down like that! Some people are fortunate in that they can eat all they want, and never gain. Ann is one of them. Plus, she goes goes goes 24/7, and the adrenaline alone is enough to prevent weight gain. She doesn't sit still long enough!

Ann is fine, just the way she is.
171 posted on 04/17/2005 11:40:09 AM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Agreed. She is a "polemicist" in the true Greek meaning of the word (it means "combatant"). She combats with her words. That is fine. That appeals to certain segment of people.

That's a good definition of Coulter. And she does a magnificent job of it. She is at her best on talking head shows where her one liners hit home. An analytical thinker would not do as well as Ann in such a setting.

For me her best was her work on Joseph McCarthy. Her worst was the piece she did for USA Today for the conventions. She was turned down and lost a great opportunity.

The kind of articles that turn me on are analytical ones that get me to think. George Will is one such writer. There are other less stuffy ones but I can't remember them right now.

I like George Will, as well as De Borchgrave, Gertz, Sowell, Noonan, Safire, and one or two more. On the other side, David Broder comes to mind first. I don't always agree with any of them, but I usually learn something.

172 posted on 04/17/2005 11:44:17 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Very unflattering picture! I agree, but then look at Ann, next to some of her feeble counterparts, if the left even has any! Randi Rhodes?? Maybe they have to make Ann look bad in the pic, so the lefties don't look absolutely horrendous in comparison. LOL
173 posted on 04/17/2005 11:44:19 AM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

Nice pic. I used to have one just like that (if that one's Midnight Blue.) I love the sun glimmers in the shot. That model is one of the prettiest that D-B/M-B produced, in my opinion of course. ;-)


174 posted on 04/17/2005 11:57:13 AM PDT by Miss Behave (Beloved daughter of Miss Creant, super sister of danged Miss Ology, and proud mother of Miss Hap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

That was my first thought!


175 posted on 04/17/2005 12:26:06 PM PDT by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Isn't the Wonkette the one who is obsessed with anal sex? I read an article she wrote in Wired about Howard Stern and she mentioned buggery at least three times!


176 posted on 04/17/2005 12:29:23 PM PDT by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tame
Ann's writing style is second to one when it comes to wit.

I enjoy Coulter's columns but no one compares to Mark Steyn.

177 posted on 04/17/2005 12:38:57 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (I'm entitled to ... bite off your left ear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Time knew that if they put a sexy picture in it would convert young males to her cause, so they made her look like....that.


178 posted on 04/17/2005 12:40:47 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Destro
[ The kind of articles that turn me on are analytical ones that get me to think. George Will is one such writer. ]

George Will analyizes only as much as his liberal benefactors allow him too.. He is a Whore and a RINO.. He cannot speak the truth.. Liberals also love him.. because he don't say the truth.. The truth about democrats is hyperbolic in essence, and patiotic in spirit.. George would never do that.. His benefactors are NOT patriots..

George Will is a TOOL of the liberal media, a judas goat, to parse the truth into a watered down LIE.. which RINOs love.. George Will is the "conservative" for appeasement.. The conservative Neville Chamberlain of reasoning with Americas greatest enemy..

THE LEFT WING MEDIACRATS..

179 posted on 04/17/2005 12:57:35 PM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

whatever.


180 posted on 04/17/2005 12:59:37 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson