Yes, the likeliest answer is that it was a botched "sting" and Clintoon chose to turn it into a propaganda event.
Then why doesn't Mr. Bush let the truth be known. That would surely sink the hildabeast and her presidency chances.
Don't get me wrong, I do think there has been a cover up here and regarding many other events like flight 800. I
just don't know why the myths are perpetuated.
If you recall Mr. Halstrom of the F.b.i. stated right after the plane was shot down that if you knew the truth about this, then he caught himself and shut the hell up.
While that is entirely possible, I am reminded that: Congressional hearings had been scheduled into just what happened at Waco.
Randy Weaver was some where in the legal process that led to a judgement against the Feds.
The assault weapons ban repeal movement was gaining ground.
The militia movement was gathering steam.
A plethora of allegations/investigations into Clintonista racketeering were going down or in their inception.
What better way to deflect public opinion than have a terrorist event, set up as a sting, but allowed to proceed, and then handily blame it on Conservatives, gun owners, Christians, and just about anyone who was willing to cry "Foul".
Just after the bombing, anyone to the Right of Hillary was branded an "extremist", and the MSM played that tune so long and hard, they had to cut new tapes.