Then why doesn't Mr. Bush let the truth be known. That would surely sink the hildabeast and her presidency chances.
Don't get me wrong, I do think there has been a cover up here and regarding many other events like flight 800. I
just don't know why the myths are perpetuated.
If you recall Mr. Halstrom of the F.b.i. stated right after the plane was shot down that if you knew the truth about this, then he caught himself and shut the hell up.
John Kerry referred to TWA800 as a terrorist attack - twice - once on Larry King and then again with Chris Matthews.
That is a good question. I'd guess "FBI files." That's the Clinton's "nuclear option."
So it's up to outsider to tear down the wall of silence.
Any attempt to expose the obvious and developing pattern of terrorist acts, as well as the incompetence (sanctioned or incidental) and possible criminal misrepresentation of facts and events leading up to 9/11 would backfire.
First, it would be seen as a late rebuttal to Fahrenheit 911, which is so shabby it does not bear a reply.
Second, the MSM would not recant, after having sold the 'official' versions of events, and instead would represent the entire thing as a partisan attempt to 'smear' Hillary.
Then they would start stumping for the 'poor wronged Hillary vote', victim of Bill's philanderings, victim of the VRWC, yadda yadda yadda. Victims are what the Democrats are all about. They are the base.
You get the picture.
Unfortunately, there is still a significant population of true believers and useful idiots who would suck this stuff up and use it to promote Hillary, quite possibly successfully.
...Then why doesn't Mr. Bush let the truth be known?...
You won't get an answer to that here.