Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Oklahoma City Bombers Have Help?
http://www.foxnews.com/index.html ^ | Saturday, April 16, 2005 | Fox

Posted on 04/16/2005 3:31:47 AM PDT by teldon30

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: CaptSkip
But I can assure all that at my home here in OKC, there were TWO distinct reports separated by a second or less in time, and the second report was larger. Kinda of a "boom..BOOM!".

[Edit for poor sentence structure.]
41 posted on 04/16/2005 5:56:47 AM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad

yes. even though he didn't appeal.


42 posted on 04/16/2005 5:59:10 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eno_

my understanding is that you don't mix, you pour. Fill the container with AN, pour in the Fuel Oil.

/had a class on blasting


43 posted on 04/16/2005 6:05:27 AM PDT by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
When all is said and done... Where did the extra leg come from?

I have always wondered that myself. To whom does that extra leg belong?

44 posted on 04/16/2005 6:11:35 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad

I know this is going to make someone ofer me more tinfoil for my hat, but in light of the fact that mass murderers and other monsters sit on death row for 20 years or more, doesn't it seem odd how fast they executed Timothy McVeigh?

Because he was a political criminal not just a murderer. He was a danger to the establishment in Washington that had to show that if you attack the US Government you will be executed post haste.

This attack on that building was a rebellion, the Govt could not let it stand and would not let it be dragged out.


45 posted on 04/16/2005 6:18:21 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Beth528
The damage that resulted could not have occurred from a van parked outside… I don't care how fancy an explosive was used. What did in that building… was an inside job.

That is correct.

The force of the explosion from the fertilizer bomb would have dimensioned as it went up and out. It would not have sheered off the side of the building from bottom to top like that. There had to have been other explosives planted inside the building to include the upper levels.

46 posted on 04/16/2005 6:20:45 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CaptSkip

But I can assure all that at my home here in OKC, there were TWO distinct reports separated by a second or less in time, and the second report was larger. Kinda of a "boom..BOOM!".

One of the Seismology centers somewhere near there reported 2 seperate shocks 8 seconds apart. The first one being far less than the follow on shock. This was reported very early on on the day of the bombing. By late afternoon that story was completely gone from the mix.


47 posted on 04/16/2005 6:21:38 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
One of the Seismology centers somewhere near there reported 2 seperate shocks 8 seconds apart. The first one being far less than the follow on shock. This was reported very early on on the day of the bombing. By late afternoon that story was completely gone from the mix.

I remember reading that very same thing.

48 posted on 04/16/2005 6:23:25 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: All

Reading Parton's analysis (an expert's expert on explosives), he says the damage to the building was impossible just by the truck bomb. Simply impossible! His analysis that many of the buildings interior pillars had to have charges wrapped on them perfectly explains what the eye witnesses (noted here) saw.


49 posted on 04/16/2005 6:24:15 AM PDT by MrDem (Monthly Special: Will write OPUS's for Whiners and Crybabies for no charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

MrDem,

I have been looking for Parton's analysis but have lost it. That is where I also got my information but am going now on memory. Could you share it please? Thank you. Then again, I could do a Google search, and I will.


50 posted on 04/16/2005 6:29:53 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: teldon30

Bump


51 posted on 04/16/2005 6:33:07 AM PDT by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teldon30
Did Oklahoma City Bombers Have Help?

I'd lay money on it.

And they're still out there planning the next attack.
52 posted on 04/16/2005 6:35:06 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

So did Stephanopoulos on his Sunday program.Also the night of the "crash" Bernie Shaw on CNN threw it to Wolf Blitzer, then CNN white House correspondent. This was about 8:45. Blitzer's first words, with the White House behind him, were that Clinton would speak to the nation about Flt 800 at about 10:00 PM. Clinton never appeared. Other priorities emerged in the White House.


53 posted on 04/16/2005 6:41:37 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
Somewhere there is an independent report from a well respected guy who examined the blast site and concluded that there was explosives on several of the main columns. I am sure somebody here has it.

More importantly I would very much like to interview the crew from CDI. They absolutely know the truth. Doug won't even talk about it I am told. End of story.

54 posted on 04/16/2005 6:41:56 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

There is something I distinctly remember something about that day. Right after it was reported that it was indeed a bomb, there was a live report of another bomb being found. You could see people running down the street in a panic and police and fireman evacuating everyone and herding them away from site. A bit later there was a report about a woman named Dana who was pinned by the rubble and a fireman who had refused to leave her side after word of a second bomb had been put out.

This ran once and was never heard again. The second bomb bomb was never mentioned again. Not even as a "false report" of a second bomb.

While I am by no means an expert on explosives, I did blow up a lot stuff in the Army as a 60mm mortarman. The damage to the building always seemed somewhat too clean and surgical for my liking.


55 posted on 04/16/2005 6:43:10 AM PDT by speed_addiction (Ninja's last words, "Hey guys. Watch me just flip out on that big dude over there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: doberville
Janet Reno, Bill and Hill, and so many others they are legion.

Mainly, however, it deflected mainstream suburbanite and urbane angst from the Clinton venue and aimed it at rural Christians and others who had read the Constitution and wanted to keep their 'ugly' guns.

Lather, rinse, repeat, the MSM brought the questionable actions of the Federal investigating agencies in Flight 800, the WTC bombing, OK City, Waco, out of the wringer just spotless (in the MSM, that is), and all those nervous people who knew at their core that something diabolical was going on gladly bought the 'official' line and only furtively looked back, if at all.

With this came the onus of "Right winged Extremist" which was now levelled at anyone who had the audacity to question anything the Clintons did. Besides, there was O.J., Bosnia/Kosovo, slaughter in the schools and streets, and any number of other things to point to rather than the provenance of campaign funds, the location of nuclear secrets and guidance system designs, or even the choice of humidors in the Oval Office.

After all, the economy was doing 'fine' (thanks in part to the MSM illusion that nothing was wrong--no terrorists here, nope, nope!), the 'extremists' were back in the shadows, and the gay liberal agenda was moving along....

Thank God that the times have changed, but we must remain eternally vigillant, regardless of what party is in control.

We still have a lot of ground to reclaim just to get back to where we were when Reagan was POTUS.

56 posted on 04/16/2005 6:45:03 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
One of the Seismology centers somewhere near there reported 2 separate shocks 8 seconds apart. The first one being far less than the follow on shock. This was reported very early on on the day of the bombing. By late afternoon that story was completely gone from the mix.

IIRC, that was the seismology lab at OU. I don't know the physics of it all, but OU is considerable further from the Murrah Bldg. than my house...30+ miles vs. less than <10 miles. Increased distance increases time between blast/shock waves and differential between the two?
57 posted on 04/16/2005 6:45:24 AM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad

Timothy McVeigh waived all appeals on his death sentance.


58 posted on 04/16/2005 6:47:47 AM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: teldon30
For more info on this subject, click on www.jaynadavis.com
59 posted on 04/16/2005 6:48:17 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

In the panic associated with his live coverage on 9-11, I heard Stephanopoulos refer to TWA800 as a bombing.


60 posted on 04/16/2005 6:50:00 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson