Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alternative Minimum Tax effects spreading
The Times-Picayune ^ | April 15, 2005 | Bill Walsh

Posted on 04/15/2005 11:21:21 AM PDT by seacapn

WASHINGTON -- Every April 15, Americans are reminded just how much they dislike paying taxes on their income. Philip Priddy is still paying off a $220,000 tax bill on money he never made.

Priddy, a Baton Rouge sales manager for Nortel, was forced to liquidate his savings, sell his boat and his wages are still being garnisheed by the Internal Revenue Service to pay off his debt. Although an extreme example, he is among a fast-growing segment of Americans who are feeling the pinch of the Alternative Minimum Tax, or AMT.

The tax originated in the late 1960s to target super-rich people who employed clever accountants to shield their income from the long arm of the IRS. But because it hasn't kept pace with wage inflation, the U.S. Treasury estimates that 3.8 million Americans this year will have to pay an AMT on top of their regular income taxes.

Most are upper-middle-class people making a comfortable living, but that will soon change, according to the Congressional Budget Office. By 2010, the agency said, nearly 30 million Americans -- 20 percent of all taxpayers and 40 percent of married couples -- will have to pay the extra tax. By then, it will hit two-thirds of taxpayers with adjusted gross income between $50,000 and $100,000, the agency projected.

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amt; tax; taxes
This tax is set to get ridiculous in 2006, and even moreso in 2010.

This should be a shot across the bow for Repulicans - once big chunks of the country start getting attacked by this tax, they will look at who was in power and did nothing to prevent it. And there will be a political reckoning.

1 posted on 04/15/2005 11:21:21 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seacapn

The problem with that theory, is that most of them live in New York and California.


2 posted on 04/15/2005 11:26:36 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

You are a 100% correct!


3 posted on 04/15/2005 11:26:54 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

"By 2010, the agency said, nearly 30 million Americans -- 20 percent of all taxpayers and 40 percent of married couples -- will have to pay the extra tax. By then, it will hit two-thirds of taxpayers with adjusted gross income between $50,000 and $100,000, the agency projected."




All of my kids fall into,or over, that range now and they are far from rich.

They all live in high cost of living areas where buying a small house can be almost impossible.

This entire thing is ridiculous.


4 posted on 04/15/2005 11:29:22 AM PDT by Mears ("The Killer Queen,caviar and cigarettes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
But McCrery, Jefferson's colleague on the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, said Congress has sewn up many of the loopholes for high earners that led to the AMT's creation a generation ago.

If this is the case, then repealing the AMT should be a no-brainer. Any Republican that thinks that doing so would be a political loser is either an idiot or crooked.

5 posted on 04/15/2005 11:31:27 AM PDT by Major Matt Mason (The U.S. Senate - Freedom's Graveyard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Most of them NOW live in New York and California, you mean.

This thing is spreading like a virus.

One possible AMT effect - eliminate charitable spending, because those deductions can come back to hurt you in the AMT scheme.

Republicans control the house, senate, and presidency.

It would be willful ignorance or malice on their part not to fix this problem now. People won't just forget when their savings are getting drained away by the IRS.


6 posted on 04/15/2005 11:32:38 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mears

That's another thing - this tax is a huge marriage penalty.


7 posted on 04/15/2005 11:33:11 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

New York and Boston area----brutal real estate,as everyone knows.


8 posted on 04/15/2005 11:47:26 AM PDT by Mears ("The Killer Queen,caviar and cigarettes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

Charitable deductions are not an AMT addback. See form 6521 and the associated instructions.


9 posted on 04/15/2005 12:05:12 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
It would be willful ignorance or malice on their part not to fix this problem now.

Meaning, of course, they won't fix it. Like the border situation, right?

10 posted on 04/15/2005 1:09:15 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Demand Mexico Turnover Fugitive Murderers: http://www.escapingjustice.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

AMT totally sucks. Complete low hanging fruit if only the GOP could develop a set ...


11 posted on 04/15/2005 1:25:33 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Your assuming that they somehow don't want the money.

They all see it coming , but they know they can dodge direct blame and may even get to buy a few votes for themselves with a few of those bucks.

When will people realise that it's not a matter of "inaction" that lets "bad" things happen ... it's a result of policy, active pursuit of a goal.

Until we change the people in the positions, the policys won't change.


12 posted on 04/15/2005 2:35:56 PM PDT by THEUPMAN (#### comment deleted by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

The AMT is the perfect manifestation of what really happens when the Dems say "tax the rich:" we all get screwed eventually, particularly when what was "super rich" in the 1960s is moderate income in this millenium.

I just saw a story on the local news showing how a guy with six kids unexpectedly found himself sucked into the AMT, and had to pay an additional $2600 in taxes. Just what a guy with six kids needs!

And the Congress has no stones to fix it, because, as the story quoted "they would stand to lose $11 billion in tax income!" Gee, sorry about that guys. We'll just tell the guy with six kids that their teeth will have to stay crooked, or he will have to drive the 1984 minivay for another few years! Just so long as the likes of Robert Byrd can porkbarrel his way to getting his name on another $300K outhouse in the woods of West Virginia somewhere!

Isn't it about time that they changed the name of West Virginia to Byrdistan or something?

To paraphrase Pogo, "we have seen the rich, and they is us!"


13 posted on 04/21/2005 6:41:03 PM PDT by SpinyNorman (Moral relativism is, by definition, the polar opposite of having values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
The tax originated in the late 1960s to target super-rich people who employed clever accountants to shield their income from the long arm of the IRS. But because it hasn't kept pace with wage inflation, the U.S. Treasury estimates that 3.8 million Americans this year will have to pay an AMT on top of their regular income taxes.

PURE BS! THe politicians knew that this tax would ensnare middle class taxpayers when they instituted it. Just like just like the regular federal income tax itself. It started out as a 1% tax on the "super-rich". Now it hits nearly everyone. And watch out for creeping FICA which was indexed to the CPI. Since wages are not keeping pace, soon everyone will pay FICA on 100% of their income too.

14 posted on 04/21/2005 6:52:11 PM PDT by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson