Replies

Authorities Seek Answers In Blasts Outside Brit Consulate

UPDATED: 6:12 pm EDT May 5, 2005

SNIPPETS:

....They were reviewing images shot by 17 security cameras at the building and other locations to try to identify possible suspects in the blasts........

....One of the security videos has raised suspicions one of the devices "may in fact have been thrown from across the street....

...Kelly -- saying a female jogger, a bicyclist and a taxi were shown on tape in the area around the time of the explosions -- made an appeal for eyewitnesses to come forward.....

....The FBI and police investigators questioned and later released a Dutch national who turned up at the building just after the blasts.....

http://www.wnbc.com/news/4452005/detail.html

May 5, 2005

Note: The following text is an exact quote:
===
===

Jeremy Reynalds
PO Box 27693
Alb., NM 87125-7693
Tel: (505) 400-7145
www.joyjunction.org

THERE'S NO JOY AT GOOGLE!
Or "Google, Why Are You Evil?"

It appears that Internet giant Google goes out of its way to carry unpatriotic, ant–Semitic and conspiratorial hate sites on its Google News.

These "Conspiracy Planet" titles, for example, are indexed on Google News (http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&q=%22conspiracy+planet%22&btnG=Search+News ). They included, "George W. ‘Lips' Bush : First Gay US President?" and "Bush - Pope Ratzinger Money Laundry Conspiracy" and "Gannon: Gay Hooker in White House Services Pols."

Then there are offerings from the pro-Islamic anti-American "Jihad Unspun", whose moniker is "A Clear View of the US War on ‘Terrorism.'"

One article was titled, "BEWARE: The New AMERICAN Quran Is Another Devious Trick." Another was called, "Jaish Al-Islami Assassinates High Profile US Officials..."

As my friend terror researcher Johnathan R. Galt (who is primarily responsible for the research in this article) told me he wrote in a recent e-mail to Google, "Why are you (Google) evil?"

What made this situation worse was that Google News banned the Jawa Report (http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/073310.php), which features pro-American commentary.

In fact, Google apparently charged the Jawa Report with propagating "hate speech."

The Google Team reportedly wrote to the Jawa administrator, "Upon recent review, we've found that your site contains hate speech, and we will no longer be including it in Google News. If you can guarantee that your news no longer includes hate speech, we will be happy to re-review the site for inclusion."

The Jawa administrator wrote (http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/073310.php ), "I challenge Google News to find one instance of ‘hate speech' on this site that is not either a case of sarcasm, humor, or a direct quote used in the context of a post that attempts to do just the opposite. Unless, of course, Google News considers saying bad things about Jew hating anti-semites, fascists who would impose religious law, or those that cut off the heads of innocent civilians hate speech. Cause in my book, that's a good thing."

And as Galt wrote to Google, "Do the Google employees who decide which sites are worth including as valid news sources REALLY HATE JEWS and AMERICANS?"

Well, not all, I'm sure, Johnathan. But more than 24 hours after writing to Google's abuse department reporting on a radical Islamic and apparently pro-terrorist blog (http://mojahidmouslim.blogspot.com) , the site is still on line.

The blog features a computer manipulated image of President George W. Bush clad in an orange jump suit sitting before five Islamic executioners and is hosted by Google.

Isn't that a threat against the President of the United States? Should it remain on line and hosted by one of the most talked about companies in the United States?

Another graphic image on the same blog shows former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld all engulfed in flames.

Aren't those also pretty overt threats?

And as an aside. I run Joy Junction, New Mexico's largest emergency homeless shelter. While our web site obviously features a lot of information about shelter activities, it also includes some news items of interest to conservatives and reports of some of the efforts I have made to combat cyber terror (www.joyjunction.org/bulletin).

Because of its news content, our web master has tried four times to get our site on Google News. Sadly, but maybe not surprisingly, we're still waiting. Could it be that the Jawa Report's no longer being carried by Google News is for the same reason that Joy Junction's web site has never been carried?

Could there be a liberal, anti-conservative, anti-American bent among some of Google's staff? It certainly appears that way, because for the moment there's no Joy (Junction) at Google News.

With that in mind, if you'd write (politely) to Google at source-suggestions@google.com and ask them what they have against the Jawa Report and Joy Junction, we'd both appreciate it!