Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The world has finally gone mad!! AAAAARGH!!!
1 posted on 04/13/2005 8:22:55 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: areafiftyone
It see this as a two-fold tactic.

For one, Gilchrist is essentially saying to the Hildebeast to "put up or shut up."

Second, if she does appear, this should embarass congressional Republicans to be crawling all over themselves to come down to show that they're more on top of this issue than the Hildebeast.

120 posted on 04/13/2005 9:30:28 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

This is great, put your money where your mouth is.


137 posted on 04/13/2005 9:59:04 AM PDT by John Lenin (It's not if it feels good ,do it, it's if it feels right , do it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I've said this before: She's going to throw the abortionists and the weak-national-defenders off the platform before 2006. It's going to happen, and only she can do it.

Conservatives have left the border issue open like a weak flank, they are spending like trophy wives with no prenup, they are not going to challenge closed shop laws, and they are going to cave on filibustering judicial nominees and social security reform.

2006 may end up really sucking for conservatives if this all comes to pass.


163 posted on 04/13/2005 10:39:56 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Isn't her husband the one who gave amnisty to millions? Suddenly she's AGAINST illegal immigration? What does that mean, that she'll just wave a wand and make them all legal?


167 posted on 04/13/2005 10:48:03 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Hitlery TALKS the big game---but she's prtty short on action.

I know of a LOT of conservative NY'er that wrote her poilte, but clear letters about illegals---they never got an answer.

Now, all of a sudden, she's the DEVOTED and SWORN enemy of ILLEGALS.

Oh, brother..........


184 posted on 04/13/2005 11:15:29 AM PDT by swordfish71 (PRAYERS for TEXAS COWBOY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Nice move. Hillary will gladly take the exposure, and it will rattle the Administration's preconceptions about having a lock on the immigration issue.

Hopefully this will prompt Prez. Bush to take some proactive steps on the border issue. It will also net Hillary some votes, but her 2006 campaign is already a shoo-in anyway so it's worth the trade-off.

206 posted on 04/13/2005 12:38:51 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Bump for later use.


216 posted on 04/13/2005 2:01:52 PM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Gilchrist's decision to invite Clinton was likely prompted by her tough comments on border security - remarks that place her sharply to the right of the Bush administration on the issue.

Great Idea

Lock Hillary in on her border security comments and pressure republicans to get to the right of her.

SO9

218 posted on 04/13/2005 2:49:26 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Idjits. Hellary is "against" illegal immigrants because she actually wants to legalize them all and up our quota for the Middle East. But she's crafty...

We do need to revise our quotas. We obviously need more low-skilled workers here, whether guest workers or people on the citizenship track, and Latin America is a good place to get them. (However, they should be Latin Americans, and not Saudis, Iraqis, Yemenis and the other miscellaneous folks streaming across the southern border.) Canada was a sieve, and the only documented security threats to us actually came through Canada, but Canada was at least willing to tighten up and cooperate. Mexico has been completely uncooperative and should be punished severely, which is the only solution to this problem..

We have got to make Mexico reinforce the border from its side. I think the "Minutemen" are being allowed to operate (because believe me, our law could stop them if it wanted to) as a threat to the Mexican government. The US, officially, cannot set up border posts, walls or any of the other things some people are clamoring for - imagine the press, and of course the judges would knock it down immediately.

But this is a wild card, and that's why Mexico is a little taken aback. Hillary, on the other hand, has simply found somebody (idjit nativists) to bamboozle, and they're flocking to drink the Kool-Aid. Dumbos.


220 posted on 04/13/2005 3:00:38 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Do it!!!!!! Shake up the Republican dinosaurs. DO IT!!!!!!


225 posted on 04/13/2005 4:41:51 PM PDT by dennisw ("Sursum corda")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
HILLARY!

Come on down!!!


226 posted on 04/13/2005 4:44:42 PM PDT by dennisw ("Sursum corda")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Not surprising, given Hillary!'s lip service to the illegal immigration problem,
and President Bush's unfortunate characterization of the Minutemen as "vigilantes".
227 posted on 04/13/2005 4:49:18 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Inviting Hillary seems like a good tactic to me. Anyone with a working knowledge of her past & ideology understands from the get go that she would not do anything about the massive illegal immigration problem other than maybe advocating an amnesty. However, in politics it is not unheard of, and not necessarily a bad idea, to use the opposing side as a force multiplier in applying pressure to one's own side in an issue fight. Grass roots efforts typically posses minimal resources. If the use a political tactic can bring attention to the issue or perhaps even result in a seat at the table with the powers that be then I have no problem with it.
228 posted on 04/13/2005 9:26:27 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
And the perfect storm I've been forecasting continues to gain strength...
229 posted on 04/13/2005 9:28:26 PM PDT by Vision (When Hillary Says She's Going To Put The Military On Our Borders...She Becomes Our Next President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson