Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Fed Up with All the Phonies
Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | April 12, 2005 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 04/13/2005 6:47:52 AM PDT by Matchett-PI

Click here to read complete transcript: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_041205/content/rush_on_a_roll.member.html

Begin Transcript [excerpted]:

RUSH: ".... and I'm just about ready to chuck all this and head to some island, get everybody's hands out of my back pocket as soon as I frigging can because I have had it.

I've had it with the state of New York. I've had it with the federal government. I've had it with everybody with their hands in my back pocket wanting this and wanting that. Nothing is ever enough for anybody and it's not worth it. At some point you just decide it isn't worth it and let people fend for themselves.

...and it just frosts me, and when I couple it with all of this rigmarole I hear from the liberals in this country about (sigh) taxes and who's not paying their fair share and stuff, it just makes me boiling mad with livid rage.

Okay. I wanted to share some of this with you, but none of the details because they say that blowing off steam is somewhat helpful. I'm not bleeding on you people. I'm not whining and moaning. I am explaining what may be an attitude that you will hear today because I tell you I'm getting fed up with so much.

I'm getting fed up with so many people like Rick Santorum who is a conservative one day, decides he wants to be president and then starts moving to the center.

I'm fed up with people like Christopher Shays. I'm fed up with this attack on Tom DeLay. He's not done one damn thing. There's no charge. He's not guilty of anything!

I'm fed up with phony baloney, plastic-banana, good-time rock and roller so-called moderate wimps like Chris Shays and all these other clowns that are going after Tom DeLay simply because he's effective.

I'm fed up with our side that doesn't stand up for our people.

I'm fed up with our guys that don't advance our agenda because they're scared.

I'm sick and tired of people that are fearful of every damn thing.

I'm sick and tired of phonies that live their lives only to get media coverage instead of be real.

I'm sick and tired of... I can't find people who are real to hang around. All I get is a bunch of phonies that want to use me or find a way to use me to get their names out there, make themselves famous or what have you in the meantime I'm trying to get things done here and everybody else is playing a game and I don't like the game.

I hate the game. I'm into reality. I just can't deal with the phoniness of it. I can't deal.

You know, I've talked to a lot of people who have gotten out of politics for the same reason. They find they can't deal with it anymore. They can't deal with the lack of sincerity they run into in people who are in politics, and I understand the needs to go out and get votes and expand and mix coalitions and constituency groups and this sort of thing, but I've always believed: Do the right thing and the politics will follow.

This judge business, the left and the way they're behaving here with John Bolton and the Dingy Harry Reid and these absolute wimps that have nothing positive to offer anybody in this country, doing nothing but trying to instill fear and loathing, build coalitions built on seething hatred and rage. These people get to certain positions of power, and it's just irritating. It's just flat-out irritating.

Yesterday I said on this program, "I wonder if they're trying to bore me, because for 16 years it's been the same old rigmarole." You know, the left hasn't changed in I don't know how many decades, but it's the same old rigmarole, and I just get tired of explaining it and talking about it to people, and when you do something about it that causes -- or is supposed to cause -- change, like elect a bunch of people that are in the majority, who are supposed to affect the change everybody believes in and then they pokey along and act afraid to do it, you throw your hands up and say, "What the hell?"

Which is I guess why some people run for office themselves, but I, frankly, am not interested in it, have no desire. All right. .....

[Huge Snips]

RUSH: Now on to one of our favorite linguini-spined Republicans, good old Christopher Shays up there in Connecticut. I think he spent too much time with John Kerry -- who, by the way, served in Vietnam. Christopher Shays says he thinks DeLay should step down but he's not demanding it. Oh no, and you know why? Let me tell you why. Because Chris Shays isn't enough to get rid of Tom DeLay! Chris Shays gave it a shot. He went out there and said, "I think he ought to go," and guess what? Nobody cared because Chris Shays doesn't speak for Republicans!

Even though he is a Republican he may as well be a Jim Jeffords; he may as well be a Lincoln Chafee, because it's going to take a lot more than you, Chris Shays, to get rid of somebody who's decent and good and moral and upstanding and a fighter and that's Tom DeLay.

He doesn't call town meetings to ask a bunch of constituents including Paul Newman how he should vote on impeachment. He knows because it's in his heart, Chris, but you don't have the guts to follow your own instincts because you are afraid so you go through this big charade of a town meeting. (Chris Shays impression) "How should I vote on impeachment?" and C-SPAN covered, everybody said, "Ooooh, this is really great, a town meeting! Why, this is civics at its best."

It was a charade. It was phony, and so Chris Shays decides over the weekend, "You know what? I'm going to move up. I'm going to get plaudits. I'm going to get great coverage in the New York Times and the Washington Post and I'm going to suggest that DeLay should go," and guess what? His suggestion wasn't enough. DeLay is still there.

DeLay is going nowhere, and so Shays has moderated. "I never said he should resign. I'm not demanding it. I'm simply suggesting it." The reason he's now moderated this is because he's not big enough.

It's going to take a lot more than Chris Shays' desire to get rid of DeLay. It's going to take a serious charge that's got some evidence behind it that's not brought by a political prosecutor down in Texas to get rid of Tom DeLay.

Here are two sound bites from Chris Shays. This is yesterday, what he said about DeLay.

SHAYS: I'm not asking him to step down. You're asking me if I think he should? Uh, yes, I think he should. That's just an honest answer to a question. Uhh, But I'm not, uh, arguing and, uh, demanding, uh, that he step down. He's still, uh, the leader. But if I think, umm, uh... but that's what I think, I think he should step down.

RUSH: Boy, that he will really powerful! You know, this is the kind of stuff that really moves minds and really moves people hearts. "Well, you're asking me if I think he should, yes, I think he should that's just an honest answer to your question but I'm not arguing or demanding that he should step down."

What is this equivocation? What is this straddling the fence? What is this wanting it both ways?

Now he's acting like he's afraid DeLay might take it out on him -- and, I'll tell you what, Chris: When you shoot at the king you better kill him. When you try to go and wound a king you better take him out. If the king is still standing and has ammo, guess who he's going to fire at someday down the line?

After that comment he then compares what's going on with DeLay to what Republicans did to Fort Worthless Jim Wright and then tries to clarify his statement again.

SHAYS: He's brought this on himself. This isn't -- this isn't the media. This isn't Democrats. Uhhh, they're doing exactly what we did, uh, with Speaker Wright and, uh, and others like him, and, uh, they're raising important questions that need to be raised. This may be, uh, , uhhh, a difference without, uh, a distinction. But I -- I was asked if I think he should step down. The answer is yes. Am I asking him to step down? No.

RUSH: Well, that's really gutsy. That's the kind of guys we need in the Republican Party, not willing to follow through on their convictions -- because this is isn't a conviction. This is a convenient statement to get praise from our enemies.

Chris Shays wants to be loved and adored by the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, and all the other BSes out there and so he says, "Well, I think he ought to go but I'm not demanding it." Yeah, that's how the country was formed, wasn't it? That's how we won World War II. "Well, I think Hitler is a bad guy but I don't know we should do anything about it."

Yeah, Chris, you're the kind of guy the backbone of America! Exactly right!

Now let's talk a little bit more about this DeLay business, because this is a general overview on travel, and I want you people to know that far more Democrats take far more such trips than do Republicans and Tom DeLay.

A little overview here: The National Center for Public policy research issued a statement last month describing its sponsorship and payment of DeLay trips and others reported on in the Washington Post, and in response to a similar story in the National Journal.

Quote: "'The National Center for Public Policy Research was careful to pay all the expenses associated with Congressman DeLay's trip. Reports to the contrary are incorrect.'

"There have been a number of trips reported on by Washington Post and others on which DeLay was a participant with other members of staff, and while the focus of most of these stories has been DeLay, these various stories include other members and staff of both parties who had the same understandings as DeLay as to the sponsor of these trips and they filed the same paperwork pursuant to those same understandings.

Every year hundreds of members of Congress and their staff travel at the invitation of tax-exempt organizations that pay for their trips.

The National Center for Policy Research was a properly registered tax-exempt educational organization.

It sponsored a number of trips that dozens of members and staff participated in. One of the trips under scrutiny." Here is the 1997 Russia trip. "'The []trip was initiated by the National Center,' spokesman Dan Allen said, 'and they were the ones that organized it, planned it and paid for it. Three DeLay staff filed the same paperwork with the same understanding."

The London trips, National Center statement: "National Center for Public policy research sponsored and fade [sic] for educational trips to Russia and to Great Britain in 1997 and 2000 that included, at our invitation, Congressman DeLay, Mrs. DeLay, and congressional staff members. Various members and staff reported this and a similar trip paid for by Center."

The Korea trip: "At least eight House members..." and we had a call about this yesterday from sniveling little liberal trying to pass himself off as a conservative who said he was very concerned about the Korea trip and he thinks if our guys are going to do things like this they ought to have the courage to resign without being forced out because we must main the high moral honor and code and all this rotgut.

Well, listen to this: "At least eight House members and 15 House aides filed the same paperwork and information on the South Korea trips including..." and this is in addition to DeLay, "including [Delegate] Faleomavaega a Democrat. Lisa Williams chief of staff to Faleomavaega said, 'He went through the process of clearing him on the ethics to the Korea trip." Jim McDermott, Democrat on the Korea trip. 'It's a great 20/20 hindsight story,' said Mike DeCesare, spokesman for McDermott," Baghdad Jim if you'll recall, who went on one of the group's trips. "'McDermott's understanding, DeCesare said, 'that was the ethics committee cleared this.' Like the dozens of Republicans and Democrat members and staff who go on trips every year, DeLay reported this and other trips, and provided the appropriate disclosure information.

Privately sponsored trips are a common bipartisan practice, although Democrats took approximately 600 more trips over the past few years.

In the past four years, there have been over 4,800 private trips of the kind DeLay is being investigated for, and they have cost $14.4 million.

Between January of 2000 and May of 2004, organizations ranging from the Aspen Institute," run now by Walter Isaacson who used to work at CNN and TIME and Newsweek and wherever the hell else, "to the World Economic Forum," where Eason Jordan went and accused us of murdering journalists, our military, "they sponsor these trips to Davos, Switzerland.

These groups ranging from Aspen to the World Economic Forum spent $14.4 million to send lawmakers on more than 4,800 trips according to an analysis of congressional trips by a news service, the Medill News Service in partnership with American Public Media's marketplace program and American Radio Works.

"Aspen Institute, the top provider of these trips is a favorite of Democrats. They spent a total of 2.7 million on 490 trips with 69.2% of the money spend on Democrats, 30% spent on Republicans, 0.8% spent on independents.

The Aspen Institute forums are held in places like Rome, Barcelona, Honolulu, Porto Vallarta, and the Bahamas. From 2000 to 2004, despite being the minority party, Democrat members of Congress took 54.3% of the trips which is 2,730, at an expense of $7,809,837. Republicans took 45.3% of the trips, grand total 2,095 totaling $6-1/2 million.

Bottom line: Democrats took over 600 more trips than Republicans between 2000 and 2004, and the top five trip makers in the order of most spent on the trips from 2000 to 2004 were all Democrats.

John Breaux [Democrat] [retired: news ] was the top trip taker in Congress. He took trips totaling $158,311.92.

Bob Wexler, [Democrat] Florida, number two. Wexler's only domestic trip was to Greenbrier up in West Virginia.

Gene Green, Democrat, Texas, third top trip maker.

Maurice Hinchey, [Democrat] New York, the fourth.

Cal Cooley, Democrat, California, was the fifth."

The Democrats are taking all these trips and they're focusing on DeLay and our guys don't stand up and defend him.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: One other thing about Chris Shays, and this is from a WorldNetDaily.com story in the year 2000. It had to do with some of the arrangements made to normalize trade with China, and it dealt with some of the relationships that the Clinton administration had with the Chinese, campaign contributions, so forth and so on. There's this little paragraph:

"Then-influential House Republican anti-impeachment leader Representative Chris Shays was able to avoid public notice when his wife Betsy [sic--Betsi] quietly accepted a six-figure appointment as director of AmeriCorps."

That's Bill Clinton's answer to the Peace Corps. Yes, Chris Shays, according to the WorldNetDaily.com, Chris Shays "able to avoid public notice when his wife Betsy quietly accepted a six-figure appointment as director of AmeriCorps" from close Clinton confidante and early damage control aid Mark Geron, who is now the director of the Peace Corps.

"The job came through on October 8th, 1998, eight weeks before the actual House impeachment vote, and these are the appointments that are known."

The story lists some others as well. So I just wanted to throw that into the mix because I had remembered something about this, but I couldn't find it anywhere, and Cookie looked it up for me, found it on WorldNetDaily.com.

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Articles... (American Spectator: The Truth About DeLay - Ben Stein) http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=8018

(Washington Post: Senators May Have Named CIA Operative) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45280-2005Apr11.html

(NewsMax: DeLay Fundraising Plied Special Interests) http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/4/11/222100.shtml

(NY DailyNews: Bill: Gay GOPer 'self-loathing') http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html

(FPM: Soros Shadow Party Stalks DeLaySoros Shadow Party Stalks DeLay) http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17686

(AP: Santorum: DeLay Needs to Answer Questions) http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050410/D89CLA881.html

(AP: Shays Says DeLay Should Step Down) http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050410/D89CP0K80.html

(LA Times: In Nevada, Reid Is the Name to Know - 06.23.03) http://www.latimes.com/services/site/premium/access-registered.intercept

(Washington Post: A 3rd DeLay Travel Controversy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28319-2005Apr5.html

(CST: Quest to get a Republican to fight DeLay may have crossed a line - Robert Novak) http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak11.html

(NRO: Eric Pfeiffer: Can DeLay survive?) http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/pfeiffer200504111009.asp


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; delay; dhpl; eib; gop; gopmodsquad; kerry; rant; rinos; rush; rushrant; santorum; shays; theusualsuspects; wimps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-349 next last
To: OXENinFLA
Rush mentioning "Clinton Legacy".....oral sex.

Also -ordinance to allow killing of wild cats has passed in Wisconsin.

181 posted on 04/13/2005 9:28:19 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
"I agree with Rush's definition of conservatism. Sorry."

So perfect conservatives get divorced three times and get addicted to pain killers? Got it.

182 posted on 04/13/2005 9:30:29 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody; Matchett-PI

RUSH basher! Did you stumble getting to this thread?


183 posted on 04/13/2005 9:31:08 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Wow... for once I agree with this centrist blowhard.

...he must've woke up with a hair across his aZZ this morning.


184 posted on 04/13/2005 9:33:16 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I don't really have any use for him, BUT give the devil his due, he knows his audience. He knows what they want RANT RANT RANT, and that's what he gives them.

"I think the guy's phony.'

He's a demagogue.


185 posted on 04/13/2005 9:33:24 AM PDT by Valin (The Problem with Reality is the lack of background music)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
Oh? It's a fact. He'd find you and me boring after a while.

And with regard to his legal and image problems, if you had the issues he's had recently, would your employer higher teams of PR folks to craft imaging for you in the community? Could you hire the best legal team to fight a potential invasion of your privacy that may be just as serious as his or even more so? Let's face it, one of the problems in the Schiavo case is that they may have had a poor legal team in the early stages of this that may have long term set them up for failure. The stakes were much higher in that case vs Rush's medical records.

Do you believe you could keep Rush entertained with the limitations of your income? Could he long term hang out with you and call you a friend without feeling bored or used? I sincerely doubt it. Not that either you or he is a bad person. It's just that you're both on different levels of life. And you may in fact have all the qualities he was pining for. And yet he'd look over you in a heartbeat.

186 posted on 04/13/2005 9:35:27 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

And you're a poopy head!


187 posted on 04/13/2005 9:35:31 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: takbodan; sierrahome
"John the Baptist was a holy man; he wasn't divorced 3 times and addicted to pain medicine."

Your self-righteousness is blinding you to the fact that they STILL laughed at John the Baptist --- in spite of the fact that he was a "holy man" and wasn't divorced 3 times and addicted to pain medicine.

So you see, you embarrass yourself, and at the same time show the leftist manipulators which one of tactics they need to use that will work best to take you down.

Altogether, Hillary's mentor in college, Saul Alinsky, in his book "Rules for Radicals" provides eleven rules of the ethics of means and ends for taking out political enemies and obtaining power:

This is the one that they will use on you:

“Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

188 posted on 04/13/2005 9:36:02 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The DemocRAT Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Valin

dem·a·gogue also dem·a·gog ( P ) Pronunciation Key (dm-gôg, -gg)
n.
A leader who obtains power by means of impassioned appeals to the emotions and prejudices of the populace.
A leader of the common people in ancient times.


You say this as if it is a bad thing? What was he gonna do, go on the radio with Republicans as his audience and start advocating to save the whales?


189 posted on 04/13/2005 9:36:10 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Nope, I don't have friends based on income. Do you?


190 posted on 04/13/2005 9:36:41 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Rush is RIGHT BTTT We have very few great leaders. And even if they are strong on some issues, they stink on others. (Think border "issue.")
191 posted on 04/13/2005 9:37:35 AM PDT by Libertina (If anything be pure, if anything be just, think on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

If that's what he thinks they want to hear, yes.


192 posted on 04/13/2005 9:39:18 AM PDT by Valin (The Problem with Reality is the lack of background music)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
He's on the money, as usual....and yesterday, Rush hit the jackpot! We need some fire in our bellies if we ever expect to win....and the Republican "leadership" had better grab the clue that THE MEDIA DO NOT LIKE YOU AND NEVER WILL, SO DON'T TRY TO BE NICE TO THEM!

Run roughshod over the Socialists! They did that to us for forty years, and will anyway if they ever regain control of the House and Senate! Treat the b&@#$%ds as what they are: DEFEATED! They never cut the Republicans an Engstrom unit (look it up) of slack, so why do we give them an AU (look it up)? I'll tell you why:
BECAUSE WE WANT TO BE LIKED!

It is better to be respected than to be liked, and better to be feared than to be respected. If Frist and the rest of those nadless wonders can't start putting some fear into the Socialists, we need to throw their worthless RINO a$$es out and put in SOMEONE WHO CAN!

(I know some of you Congressional and Senatorial staffers are reading this....so if you think the rank and file don't matter, that we'll vote for your guys regardless of how wussy they are.....THINK AGAIN! We'll either stay home or bolt the Party....and in either case, your wuss will be out of a job, and SO WILL YOU! Tell them to either $hit or get off the pot and to start behaving like conservatives, or we'll find someone with the testicular fortitude to do it instead of them!)

193 posted on 04/13/2005 9:39:18 AM PDT by Bombardier (Strategic Air Command (SAC): Mission Accomplished, but needed now more than ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Interesting point- could be a chicken/egg thing.


194 posted on 04/13/2005 9:40:37 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
It's tough to say. I'm distincly middle class. I can't think of anyone I'm close to that's wealthy nor can I think of anyone I'm close to that's poor. The people who have chosen me for a friend are in my socio-economic group and we have similar likes, morals, values and dislikes. The people I tend to meet are in that social class.

I don't hold my nose when I am in a group of poor folks, nor do I fawn over the wealthy.

i guess the best barometer is send Rush a note and see if he's willing to hang out with you to fulfill his need for friends that aren't users. Might be interesting. My guess is even if he made the overture, it wouldn't last long.

195 posted on 04/13/2005 9:41:18 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

How do you know I haven't already? *chuckles*


196 posted on 04/13/2005 9:42:03 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08

What is weak kneed about Santorum? I thought he did quite well defending Delay. He stood up to Hillary and all other Dems.


197 posted on 04/13/2005 9:45:14 AM PDT by Safetgiver (Only two requisites to be a judge. Gray hair to look wise and hemmorhoids to look concerned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
Good luck!

Let me know when he's there for your birthday, your kids birthday, stops by to cheer you up when you're down, offers to buy a cup of coffee on a whim, shares his tickets to your favorite concert/event or does something with you that is something he has no interest in but knows you do so he just tags along.

198 posted on 04/13/2005 9:46:30 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Again, how do you know he hasn't already?


199 posted on 04/13/2005 9:47:01 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: writer33
"Keep up the great work, Rush. We love you here!"

Ditto THAT! bttt!

200 posted on 04/13/2005 9:47:02 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The DemocRAT Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson