Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Fed Up with All the Phonies
Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | April 12, 2005 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 04/13/2005 6:47:52 AM PDT by Matchett-PI

Click here to read complete transcript: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_041205/content/rush_on_a_roll.member.html

Begin Transcript [excerpted]:

RUSH: ".... and I'm just about ready to chuck all this and head to some island, get everybody's hands out of my back pocket as soon as I frigging can because I have had it.

I've had it with the state of New York. I've had it with the federal government. I've had it with everybody with their hands in my back pocket wanting this and wanting that. Nothing is ever enough for anybody and it's not worth it. At some point you just decide it isn't worth it and let people fend for themselves.

...and it just frosts me, and when I couple it with all of this rigmarole I hear from the liberals in this country about (sigh) taxes and who's not paying their fair share and stuff, it just makes me boiling mad with livid rage.

Okay. I wanted to share some of this with you, but none of the details because they say that blowing off steam is somewhat helpful. I'm not bleeding on you people. I'm not whining and moaning. I am explaining what may be an attitude that you will hear today because I tell you I'm getting fed up with so much.

I'm getting fed up with so many people like Rick Santorum who is a conservative one day, decides he wants to be president and then starts moving to the center.

I'm fed up with people like Christopher Shays. I'm fed up with this attack on Tom DeLay. He's not done one damn thing. There's no charge. He's not guilty of anything!

I'm fed up with phony baloney, plastic-banana, good-time rock and roller so-called moderate wimps like Chris Shays and all these other clowns that are going after Tom DeLay simply because he's effective.

I'm fed up with our side that doesn't stand up for our people.

I'm fed up with our guys that don't advance our agenda because they're scared.

I'm sick and tired of people that are fearful of every damn thing.

I'm sick and tired of phonies that live their lives only to get media coverage instead of be real.

I'm sick and tired of... I can't find people who are real to hang around. All I get is a bunch of phonies that want to use me or find a way to use me to get their names out there, make themselves famous or what have you in the meantime I'm trying to get things done here and everybody else is playing a game and I don't like the game.

I hate the game. I'm into reality. I just can't deal with the phoniness of it. I can't deal.

You know, I've talked to a lot of people who have gotten out of politics for the same reason. They find they can't deal with it anymore. They can't deal with the lack of sincerity they run into in people who are in politics, and I understand the needs to go out and get votes and expand and mix coalitions and constituency groups and this sort of thing, but I've always believed: Do the right thing and the politics will follow.

This judge business, the left and the way they're behaving here with John Bolton and the Dingy Harry Reid and these absolute wimps that have nothing positive to offer anybody in this country, doing nothing but trying to instill fear and loathing, build coalitions built on seething hatred and rage. These people get to certain positions of power, and it's just irritating. It's just flat-out irritating.

Yesterday I said on this program, "I wonder if they're trying to bore me, because for 16 years it's been the same old rigmarole." You know, the left hasn't changed in I don't know how many decades, but it's the same old rigmarole, and I just get tired of explaining it and talking about it to people, and when you do something about it that causes -- or is supposed to cause -- change, like elect a bunch of people that are in the majority, who are supposed to affect the change everybody believes in and then they pokey along and act afraid to do it, you throw your hands up and say, "What the hell?"

Which is I guess why some people run for office themselves, but I, frankly, am not interested in it, have no desire. All right. .....

[Huge Snips]

RUSH: Now on to one of our favorite linguini-spined Republicans, good old Christopher Shays up there in Connecticut. I think he spent too much time with John Kerry -- who, by the way, served in Vietnam. Christopher Shays says he thinks DeLay should step down but he's not demanding it. Oh no, and you know why? Let me tell you why. Because Chris Shays isn't enough to get rid of Tom DeLay! Chris Shays gave it a shot. He went out there and said, "I think he ought to go," and guess what? Nobody cared because Chris Shays doesn't speak for Republicans!

Even though he is a Republican he may as well be a Jim Jeffords; he may as well be a Lincoln Chafee, because it's going to take a lot more than you, Chris Shays, to get rid of somebody who's decent and good and moral and upstanding and a fighter and that's Tom DeLay.

He doesn't call town meetings to ask a bunch of constituents including Paul Newman how he should vote on impeachment. He knows because it's in his heart, Chris, but you don't have the guts to follow your own instincts because you are afraid so you go through this big charade of a town meeting. (Chris Shays impression) "How should I vote on impeachment?" and C-SPAN covered, everybody said, "Ooooh, this is really great, a town meeting! Why, this is civics at its best."

It was a charade. It was phony, and so Chris Shays decides over the weekend, "You know what? I'm going to move up. I'm going to get plaudits. I'm going to get great coverage in the New York Times and the Washington Post and I'm going to suggest that DeLay should go," and guess what? His suggestion wasn't enough. DeLay is still there.

DeLay is going nowhere, and so Shays has moderated. "I never said he should resign. I'm not demanding it. I'm simply suggesting it." The reason he's now moderated this is because he's not big enough.

It's going to take a lot more than Chris Shays' desire to get rid of DeLay. It's going to take a serious charge that's got some evidence behind it that's not brought by a political prosecutor down in Texas to get rid of Tom DeLay.

Here are two sound bites from Chris Shays. This is yesterday, what he said about DeLay.

SHAYS: I'm not asking him to step down. You're asking me if I think he should? Uh, yes, I think he should. That's just an honest answer to a question. Uhh, But I'm not, uh, arguing and, uh, demanding, uh, that he step down. He's still, uh, the leader. But if I think, umm, uh... but that's what I think, I think he should step down.

RUSH: Boy, that he will really powerful! You know, this is the kind of stuff that really moves minds and really moves people hearts. "Well, you're asking me if I think he should, yes, I think he should that's just an honest answer to your question but I'm not arguing or demanding that he should step down."

What is this equivocation? What is this straddling the fence? What is this wanting it both ways?

Now he's acting like he's afraid DeLay might take it out on him -- and, I'll tell you what, Chris: When you shoot at the king you better kill him. When you try to go and wound a king you better take him out. If the king is still standing and has ammo, guess who he's going to fire at someday down the line?

After that comment he then compares what's going on with DeLay to what Republicans did to Fort Worthless Jim Wright and then tries to clarify his statement again.

SHAYS: He's brought this on himself. This isn't -- this isn't the media. This isn't Democrats. Uhhh, they're doing exactly what we did, uh, with Speaker Wright and, uh, and others like him, and, uh, they're raising important questions that need to be raised. This may be, uh, , uhhh, a difference without, uh, a distinction. But I -- I was asked if I think he should step down. The answer is yes. Am I asking him to step down? No.

RUSH: Well, that's really gutsy. That's the kind of guys we need in the Republican Party, not willing to follow through on their convictions -- because this is isn't a conviction. This is a convenient statement to get praise from our enemies.

Chris Shays wants to be loved and adored by the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, and all the other BSes out there and so he says, "Well, I think he ought to go but I'm not demanding it." Yeah, that's how the country was formed, wasn't it? That's how we won World War II. "Well, I think Hitler is a bad guy but I don't know we should do anything about it."

Yeah, Chris, you're the kind of guy the backbone of America! Exactly right!

Now let's talk a little bit more about this DeLay business, because this is a general overview on travel, and I want you people to know that far more Democrats take far more such trips than do Republicans and Tom DeLay.

A little overview here: The National Center for Public policy research issued a statement last month describing its sponsorship and payment of DeLay trips and others reported on in the Washington Post, and in response to a similar story in the National Journal.

Quote: "'The National Center for Public Policy Research was careful to pay all the expenses associated with Congressman DeLay's trip. Reports to the contrary are incorrect.'

"There have been a number of trips reported on by Washington Post and others on which DeLay was a participant with other members of staff, and while the focus of most of these stories has been DeLay, these various stories include other members and staff of both parties who had the same understandings as DeLay as to the sponsor of these trips and they filed the same paperwork pursuant to those same understandings.

Every year hundreds of members of Congress and their staff travel at the invitation of tax-exempt organizations that pay for their trips.

The National Center for Policy Research was a properly registered tax-exempt educational organization.

It sponsored a number of trips that dozens of members and staff participated in. One of the trips under scrutiny." Here is the 1997 Russia trip. "'The []trip was initiated by the National Center,' spokesman Dan Allen said, 'and they were the ones that organized it, planned it and paid for it. Three DeLay staff filed the same paperwork with the same understanding."

The London trips, National Center statement: "National Center for Public policy research sponsored and fade [sic] for educational trips to Russia and to Great Britain in 1997 and 2000 that included, at our invitation, Congressman DeLay, Mrs. DeLay, and congressional staff members. Various members and staff reported this and a similar trip paid for by Center."

The Korea trip: "At least eight House members..." and we had a call about this yesterday from sniveling little liberal trying to pass himself off as a conservative who said he was very concerned about the Korea trip and he thinks if our guys are going to do things like this they ought to have the courage to resign without being forced out because we must main the high moral honor and code and all this rotgut.

Well, listen to this: "At least eight House members and 15 House aides filed the same paperwork and information on the South Korea trips including..." and this is in addition to DeLay, "including [Delegate] Faleomavaega a Democrat. Lisa Williams chief of staff to Faleomavaega said, 'He went through the process of clearing him on the ethics to the Korea trip." Jim McDermott, Democrat on the Korea trip. 'It's a great 20/20 hindsight story,' said Mike DeCesare, spokesman for McDermott," Baghdad Jim if you'll recall, who went on one of the group's trips. "'McDermott's understanding, DeCesare said, 'that was the ethics committee cleared this.' Like the dozens of Republicans and Democrat members and staff who go on trips every year, DeLay reported this and other trips, and provided the appropriate disclosure information.

Privately sponsored trips are a common bipartisan practice, although Democrats took approximately 600 more trips over the past few years.

In the past four years, there have been over 4,800 private trips of the kind DeLay is being investigated for, and they have cost $14.4 million.

Between January of 2000 and May of 2004, organizations ranging from the Aspen Institute," run now by Walter Isaacson who used to work at CNN and TIME and Newsweek and wherever the hell else, "to the World Economic Forum," where Eason Jordan went and accused us of murdering journalists, our military, "they sponsor these trips to Davos, Switzerland.

These groups ranging from Aspen to the World Economic Forum spent $14.4 million to send lawmakers on more than 4,800 trips according to an analysis of congressional trips by a news service, the Medill News Service in partnership with American Public Media's marketplace program and American Radio Works.

"Aspen Institute, the top provider of these trips is a favorite of Democrats. They spent a total of 2.7 million on 490 trips with 69.2% of the money spend on Democrats, 30% spent on Republicans, 0.8% spent on independents.

The Aspen Institute forums are held in places like Rome, Barcelona, Honolulu, Porto Vallarta, and the Bahamas. From 2000 to 2004, despite being the minority party, Democrat members of Congress took 54.3% of the trips which is 2,730, at an expense of $7,809,837. Republicans took 45.3% of the trips, grand total 2,095 totaling $6-1/2 million.

Bottom line: Democrats took over 600 more trips than Republicans between 2000 and 2004, and the top five trip makers in the order of most spent on the trips from 2000 to 2004 were all Democrats.

John Breaux [Democrat] [retired: news ] was the top trip taker in Congress. He took trips totaling $158,311.92.

Bob Wexler, [Democrat] Florida, number two. Wexler's only domestic trip was to Greenbrier up in West Virginia.

Gene Green, Democrat, Texas, third top trip maker.

Maurice Hinchey, [Democrat] New York, the fourth.

Cal Cooley, Democrat, California, was the fifth."

The Democrats are taking all these trips and they're focusing on DeLay and our guys don't stand up and defend him.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: One other thing about Chris Shays, and this is from a WorldNetDaily.com story in the year 2000. It had to do with some of the arrangements made to normalize trade with China, and it dealt with some of the relationships that the Clinton administration had with the Chinese, campaign contributions, so forth and so on. There's this little paragraph:

"Then-influential House Republican anti-impeachment leader Representative Chris Shays was able to avoid public notice when his wife Betsy [sic--Betsi] quietly accepted a six-figure appointment as director of AmeriCorps."

That's Bill Clinton's answer to the Peace Corps. Yes, Chris Shays, according to the WorldNetDaily.com, Chris Shays "able to avoid public notice when his wife Betsy quietly accepted a six-figure appointment as director of AmeriCorps" from close Clinton confidante and early damage control aid Mark Geron, who is now the director of the Peace Corps.

"The job came through on October 8th, 1998, eight weeks before the actual House impeachment vote, and these are the appointments that are known."

The story lists some others as well. So I just wanted to throw that into the mix because I had remembered something about this, but I couldn't find it anywhere, and Cookie looked it up for me, found it on WorldNetDaily.com.

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Articles... (American Spectator: The Truth About DeLay - Ben Stein) http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=8018

(Washington Post: Senators May Have Named CIA Operative) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45280-2005Apr11.html

(NewsMax: DeLay Fundraising Plied Special Interests) http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/4/11/222100.shtml

(NY DailyNews: Bill: Gay GOPer 'self-loathing') http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html

(FPM: Soros Shadow Party Stalks DeLaySoros Shadow Party Stalks DeLay) http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17686

(AP: Santorum: DeLay Needs to Answer Questions) http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050410/D89CLA881.html

(AP: Shays Says DeLay Should Step Down) http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050410/D89CP0K80.html

(LA Times: In Nevada, Reid Is the Name to Know - 06.23.03) http://www.latimes.com/services/site/premium/access-registered.intercept

(Washington Post: A 3rd DeLay Travel Controversy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28319-2005Apr5.html

(CST: Quest to get a Republican to fight DeLay may have crossed a line - Robert Novak) http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak11.html

(NRO: Eric Pfeiffer: Can DeLay survive?) http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/pfeiffer200504111009.asp


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; delay; dhpl; eib; gop; gopmodsquad; kerry; rant; rinos; rush; rushrant; santorum; shays; theusualsuspects; wimps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-349 next last
To: RushCrush
Its time to scorch the microphone with invective and let all the weenie Pubbies, johnny-come-lately-Conservatives, highly critical cheese-&-brie-poltical-scientist-wannabe-keyboard-jockeys-in-chatrooms-that-never-did-a-thing-in-their-lives be damned.

Megadittoes to that!

I won't mention any names.

121 posted on 04/13/2005 8:13:51 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: xzins

"He might think his "hush bimbo" is cute, but I interpret it as sheer jealousy on the part of a bantamweight who can't deal with the heavyweight in the room, so he has to badmouth him. And it is so ignorant and adolescent....schoolyard stuff."


I agree with you. Its just delusional to perceive Rush and Savage as rivals, as players in the same league, or that there's some kind of repartee going on between them. Its one way: Savage is throwing out bait, trying to lure Rush into an internecine battle in order to boost his own ratings. Its a lame strategy for someone who is supposedly so brilliant. If Rush, as some are claiming, listens to Savage, it begs the question: why would Rush listen to Savage rather than those competitors who have a much BIGGER audience?


122 posted on 04/13/2005 8:15:06 AM PDT by macamadamia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

It sounds like Elliot Spitzer is grandstanding by making a play for Rush's money that NY is NOT entitled to.


123 posted on 04/13/2005 8:16:42 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

Rush's rant was just his retreaded version of the guy in the movie. I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE. He probably figures it was good entertainment then so what the heck.


124 posted on 04/13/2005 8:16:53 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; GianniV; oldglory; MinuteGal; JulieRNR21; gonzo; mcmuffin; blackie; Pukin Dog; ...
"A lot of people feel like Rush around April 15."

And after they've spent over 16 years working their a$$ off on the radio to help conservatives get elected to office only to watch them wimp out and be too AFRAID to advance the conservative agenda. And worse still, turn into RINOS so as to advance their own personal agenda once they get there.

Who WOULDN'T be frustrated under those circumstances?

I'm with Rush! I hope he moves his business off-shore and broadcasts from satellite. I'd donate to the cause if we could put our own satellite into orbit.

The SOLE reason I don't go into business is because of all the tax parasites waiting in the wings to get as much of a piece of my action as they can get away with so they can use it to buy votes to perpetuate themselves in office.

Oppressive tax policy and over-regulation are the reasons private businesses can't flourish. I'd rather do with less than put myself at the "taxing" mercy of parasitic low-lifes who could care less about the good of the country.

125 posted on 04/13/2005 8:17:15 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The DemocRAT Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What's it mean when people can't have good faith disagreements. :>)

Maybe they don't have good faith?:>)
126 posted on 04/13/2005 8:17:56 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: swordfish71
NYS is ALWAYS looking for money---they nail the residents and non-residents pretty hard, and the taxes seem to always be skyrocketing.

I understand that baseball players have to have accountants filling out mountains of paperwork in order to comply with all the states and municipalities that lay claim on their earnings while they are playing on the road. Tax system GONE CRAZY!!!

127 posted on 04/13/2005 8:18:45 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Exactly right. My family owns a small business, it is STIFLING.


128 posted on 04/13/2005 8:18:47 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: macamadamia
"He might think his "hush bimbo" is cute, but I interpret it as sheer jealousy on the part of a bantamweight who can't deal with the heavyweight in the room, so he has to badmouth him. And it is so ignorant and adolescent....schoolyard stuff."

The only reason I can think of is.......Savage is a San Franciscan... That speaks...errrr screams volumes......

129 posted on 04/13/2005 8:19:40 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: macamadamia

If Rush listens to him, I'll bet it's only in 5 minute slices.

Sorta like getting dosed with a laxative.


130 posted on 04/13/2005 8:19:51 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

I say let the PRODUCTIVE well-to-do crowd go on strike. Tell the governments (Fed, State, Munis) to F off. I mean people who actually produce something. Entrepreneurs. Not talking head pundits. But people who actually risk capital and hire people. Let's see what happens then.


131 posted on 04/13/2005 8:24:12 AM PDT by bombthrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: halieus

I am angry that he went on a rant of pity.


132 posted on 04/13/2005 8:25:17 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ken21
Having had to deal with NY for years and years I can understand perfectly his frustration.

You can stand on your head and they'll insist it's taxable. Breathe, that's taxable too.

I just don't see why he went off on a poor me, I can't take it anymore rant.

133 posted on 04/13/2005 8:27:05 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

It was entertaining to me, which is one reason why I listen.
Nobody can rant like Rush.


134 posted on 04/13/2005 8:29:08 AM PDT by RushCrush (Blind Rushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: I still care; oldglory; MinuteGal; JulieRNR21; gonzo; mcmuffin; sheikdetailfeather; blackie; ...
"Rush was way too angry."

Funny. I thought he wasn't angry enough. If he'd been a little angrier, he would have blasted a few more phony RINO wimps.

If opportunistic, unprincipled, prissy, metrosexual, wimpy males like Shays wants to step out there at the prodding of the RATS and the MSM and take a shot at a real MAN of principle like Tom Delay, let the sucker be exposed BIG TIME by Rush for being on the take from Clinton during impeachment.

135 posted on 04/13/2005 8:30:11 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The DemocRAT Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: voteconstitutionparty
Yes, he morphed into raging about politicians but his anger seemed to have it's roots in income tax time.

Welcome to the club, Rush.

136 posted on 04/13/2005 8:31:44 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08

Wow. That is exactly how I am feeling too. Interesting...


137 posted on 04/13/2005 8:33:50 AM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross (Code pink stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"When Rush is perfectly conservative, please let me know."

I would, if I thought your opinion was the last word in what constitutes conservativism.

I agree with Rush's definition of conservatism. Sorry. Take your chicken-little negativism and go pout somewhere else.

138 posted on 04/13/2005 8:34:43 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (The DemocRAT Party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I am no great fan of Sean's, but I disagree completely about the last election.

Sean was out in Ohio constantly keeping the drumbeat up for Bush.

He got those people energized and in the end it was all about Ohio!

Where was Rush? Who knows?

139 posted on 04/13/2005 8:35:41 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: All

bump

Time to take out the trash.


140 posted on 04/13/2005 8:35:42 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson