Just like pesticides and shotguns.
"Just like pesticides and shotguns."
Ah, how very liberal of you.
That's an incredibly ridiculous statement. Maybe you even know that.
Man is the ultimate guardian of nature. He is responsible to use his BRAIN and tools to keep nature in balance. When logic is trumped by emotionalism, people and animals suffer.
Emotionalism led to the ban on DDT without scientific evidence of harm. The result is millions of people died a painful death. Along with man birds that were bitten by diseased mosquitos. There's a rebuttal to your idiotic 'pesticides' argument.
In certain areas, emotionalism has lead to hunting bans. In other places, people wanted predators removed so certain 'pretty' animals like deer could flourish. Guess what. They flourished. Then they reached a point of overpopulation. Then they starved. They suffered a cruel, inhuman death because of people using their emotions and their feelings instead of their brains. Now they are kept in check with shotguns and rifles.
Now for your poor little kittie cat. If he does get out in the wild, the biggest threat isn't a hunter with a gun. It's a full blown feral cat that will kill your fluffy friend just for fun. You and others talk about this being cruel to animals. There are few things more cruel than a feral at in the wild that will toy with its pray before it is killed. And it will do this over and over again to many different animals throughout its lifetime.
Now who is the cruel one: The conservationists who want to keep this from happening, or you, the one who wants an invasive species to be allowed to roam free and kill countless animals in a cruel manner?
It's become very clear that you and people like you are the problem. You allow the feral cats to go unchecked with your ridiculous factless arguments that try to equate wild animals with a common housecat.
Here, why don't you start demanding the armed forces stop its feral cat control program:
http://www.afpmb.org/pubs/tims/tim37.htm