Excellent article.
redrock
1 posted on
04/12/2005 4:08:25 PM PDT by
redrock
To: HiJinx; AuntB; Reaganwuzthebest; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Excellent article.
redrock
2 posted on
04/12/2005 4:09:53 PM PDT by
redrock
(Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock. --Will Rogers)
To: redrock
It would be interesting how they would rule if a case similar to Plyler v Doe were heard today. It barely passed in 1981 with a liberal court. There's no doubt next to Roe v Wade that was probably one of the most disastrous decisions to come out of USSC in recent years.
To: redrock
Time to rein in the Supremes.
Bush had better get a lot more aggressive with his judicial nominations. Like fighting for them for a change...
5 posted on
04/12/2005 4:28:35 PM PDT by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: redrock
6 posted on
04/12/2005 4:31:20 PM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: redrock
September 11, 2001, underscored that we need greater government scrutiny over our borders and immigration. Congresss role in drafting and the executives authority in enforcing immigration law have never been more important, and the judiciarys interference with these constitutional roles has never been more dangerous. BTTT
7 posted on
04/12/2005 4:32:18 PM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: lonevoice
To: redrock
Thanks Brother
Bookmarked for later read.
To: redrock
Thanks for posting CIS always does the best research. Here is the money quote.
The Court makes no attempt to disguise that it is acting to make up for Congresss lack of effective leadership in dealing with the serious national problems caused by the influx of uncountable millions of illegal aliens across our borders. The failure of enforcement of the immigration laws over more than a decade and the inherent difficulty and expense of sealing our vast borders have combined to create a grave socioeconomic dilemma. It is a dilemma that has not yet even been fully assessed, let alone addressed. However, it is not the function of the Judiciary to provide effective leadership simply because the political branches of government fail to do so.56
Chief Justice Warren Burger,
11 posted on
04/12/2005 5:11:59 PM PDT by
usurper
(Correct spelling is overrated)
To: redrock
12 posted on
04/12/2005 8:07:00 PM PDT by
jokar
(On line data base http://www.trackingthethreat.com/db/index.htm)
To: redrock
13 posted on
04/13/2005 2:22:14 AM PDT by
lainde
To: redrock
Excellent article ~ Bump!
Be Ever Vigilant!
15 posted on
04/13/2005 7:42:08 AM PDT by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: redrock
Great article bump - why are we allowing courts to make law - they do NOT have that power and we need a constitutional show down - my concern is that we have to many RINOs in congress that will side with liberals. McCain most especially!!!!
16 posted on
04/13/2005 8:21:19 AM PDT by
sasafras
(Innocent blood is on Bush's hands for doing nothing to protect our border)
To: redrock
17 posted on
04/13/2005 9:41:45 AM PDT by
FBD
( "A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." ~Bertrand de Jouvenel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson