I'd still rather have Condi as president than Hitlery. And I'm pro-life, NOT "pro-choice." I know that Condi would likely sign any legislation to ban abortions if such were to come across her desk. The QB, on the other hand, would vehemently oppose any legislation that didn't make abortion mandatory. My point is this: Rice would probably beat Hillary in any election, and I'd rather vote for a pro-choice Republican than an anti-freedom Socialist.
Barney Frank would probably be preferrable to Senator Clinton, but that's not the issue. Why put your vote behind a pro-abortion candidate before we get to the primaries? There ARE other options. As a matter of fact, there are other and better FEMALE options than Condoleezza Rice. She is great on foreign policy, and she is doing a fine job as SOS, but she is not a social conservative.