Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MacDorcha

> If you're talking about the Biblical interp of Creationism I would disagree. If you're talking about "6 days and God said 'poof' and that was it" then yes, I would go with you.

The two are not distinct. When one says "Creationism," one is almost invariably referring to the obsolete notion that God said "poof." The other meaning you seem to attach to the word is not often called "Creationism," instead the idea is known as "theological evolutionism." I.E. God created the diversity of life on Earth via the physical process of evolution. Few evolutionists would take issue with this stance. Many Creationists would, however, and would gleefully declare anyone who held that view to be Biblically flawed.


325 posted on 04/11/2005 9:10:56 PM PDT by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: orionblamblam

Theological Evolutionism, Intellegent Design, Creationism. Identical in my eyes and most of my friends who claim "creationist" standings. Evolution is admissable in all camps I'm aware of.


327 posted on 04/11/2005 9:36:32 PM PDT by MacDorcha ("Do you want the e-mail copy or the fax?" "Just the fax, ma'am.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

To: orionblamblam
When one says "Creationism," one is almost invariably referring to the obsolete notion that God said "poof."

Unlike the BigBang where Astronomers said.....

POOF!


345 posted on 04/12/2005 5:58:37 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson