Posted on 04/10/2005 5:29:18 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - Ahead of a contentious confirmation hearing, Democrats on Sunday sharpened their criticism of President Bush's nominee to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, saying John Bolton has a poor record as a policy-maker and little regard for the world body.
But the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Richard Lugar (news, bio, voting record), R-Ind., said Bolton was the president's "instrument of reform" for the United Nations and his bluntness should not disqualify him from serving.
Lugar said he would vote to confirm Bolton, but committee Democrats who appeared on the Sunday talk shows said they expected to go against the president.
The committee, with a 10-8 Republican majority, planned a Monday morning hearing on Bolton, who has served in the past three Republican administrations and has been one of the strongest conservative voices on foreign affairs.
Senate Democrats have circulated a portion of a two-year-old Senate Intelligence Committee report questioning whether Bolton pressured a State Department intelligence analyst who tried to tone down language in a 2002 speech on Cuba. In that speech, Bolton said Cuba was trying to develop biological weapons and was transferring its technical expertise to countries hostile to the United States. At the time, some officials said the information should not have been publicly disclosed. Cuba has denied the weapons allegation.
Bolton, the undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, has stirred controversy because of his gruffness, occasional outbursts, opposition to a number of treaties and outspoken criticism of the United Nations.
"I appreciate that many people have views about John Bolton's personality, his bluntness, the way that he handles himself," Lugar told CNN's "Late Edition."
"These are not, in my judgment, disqualifiers for a presidential nominee who is going to the U.N. to create reform," Lugar said.
But Sen. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record), D-Del., told CNN he would not vote to confirm Bolton. He said at a time when the president is relying more on U.N. cooperation with U.S. efforts in the Sudan and the Middle East, "I think it's a bad idea to have a man there who doesn't have much regard for the U.N."
When Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada was asked if he would consider joining a filibuster on the president's nominee, he told CBS's "Face the Nation" he didn't know.
"He doesn't appear to be the best guy for the job, but let the committee work on this," Reid said.
Sen. Rick Santorum (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa., had words of praise for Bolton, saying he had an "exemplary record."
"I think he's the right man for the U.N. because he brings the kind of candor that you need to an organization that's got a lot of trouble, does not have a lot of support here in the United States, does not have a lot of support in the Congress, particularly the Republican side," Santorum told ABC's "This Week."
"And I think having a man of that kind of strength is going to be an important thing for the U.N. to regain its credibility in the Congress."
Sen. Christopher Dodd (news, bio, voting record), D-Conn., said he thought there was very credible information that Bolton tried at least twice to have intelligence analysts removed from their jobs because he was going to state a position which contradicted the information that the intelligence community believed was correct.
"If in fact he tried to have people dismissed because he did not like the analysis, then I don't think he's qualified to serve," Dodd told ABC.
If confirmed, Bolton would succeed former Sen. John Danforth.
The Democrats long for the days when world leaders could bang their shoes on a table, or address the UN armed with a pistola.
If the Democrats think it's a mistake, then by definition it has to be right.
If the rats want the UN to have any credibility then put a Bolton in there. We will believe him when he tells us something good is happening . We don't need a yes man. And I wonder who the rats would be happy with ? Bubba ??? Winning elections has its benefits .....
We'll get a lot more results that way.
Moving UN headquarters to Sudan ain't a bad idea either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.