Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aliska
Why blame Diana for trapping Charles into the marriage anyway? He didn't have to marry her.

Please pardon my intrusion to your dialog with someone else but, I think Charles married Diana to have heirs, and that was all. I may be wrong, but that's just my opinion.

69 posted on 04/09/2005 12:32:19 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: pbrown

You're right. He was in his early 30's and was getting pressure to produce an heir. It ain't easy to find a virgin nowadays. I think she had unrealistic expectations.


75 posted on 04/09/2005 12:38:37 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: pbrown
Charles married Diana to have heirs, and that was all. I may be wrong, but that's just my opinion.

I don't know for sure why he married her. Sounds like another king who messed up things royally. Granted, marrying for love has been an alien concept for centuries.

I still think Diana loved him in the beginning. Under the circumstances, she was a wonderful mother to her children. I will never forget that picture of her on the roller coaster with one of her sons. She wanted to show them what normal life was like. She loved those children.

I don't like to see her memory besmirched by some of the chauvinistic attitudes on this thread. Charles good old boy adulterer gets a pass while Diana is trashed, bless her memory, imperfect creature though she was, like most of the rest of us.

77 posted on 04/09/2005 12:39:50 PM PDT by Aliska (Theresa Marie Schindler, December 3, 1963 - March 31, 2005, Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson