Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

"something did happen at the end of Hatshepsut reign. Something
so bad that she was almost blotted from history because of it."

Well, I haven't read up on much of her history, but I'm
quite sure I've seen multiple times that her (step?) son
truly hated her. I've read it was considered tradition
for the next Pharaoh to destroy or alter an earlier
Pharaoh's creations, but he took it farther than most
others (which, if I were a man & didn't want the masses
to remember my power was usurped by a woman, I'd
probably try to annihilate all traces of it too).


187 posted on 04/09/2005 7:03:23 PM PDT by Darkchylde (The Crazed Unknown Hermit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Darkchylde
That is the CW but Egyptians took their history very very seriously. The Pharaoh's were gods on earth. To blot out their name was to destroy their souls. It was the blackest of blasphemies and was only done, IIRC three times and it was carried out by the priests.

Hatshepsut had the priest's full support to take the throne and kept their support almost to the end. They would not have been interested in her feud with her stepson, (who only had the throne because he married Hatshepsut royal daughter, his half sister) Her reign was one of the most prosperous times in Egyptian history.

To rebuild was one thing but this went beyond that to the blotting out of her existence. Something far worse then a family argument happened in the opinion of many scholars.

189 posted on 04/09/2005 7:17:59 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe. The loud ones only take the credit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson