Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opponents say pass to proposed 'Road Rage Reduction Act' (GET OUT OF THE LEFT LANE!)
http://www.news-journalonline.com ^ | Last update: April 08, 2005 | By JIM HAUG

Posted on 04/08/2005 6:29:31 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican

TALLAHASSEE -- Slowpokes could get a $60 fine for hogging the fast lane and ticking off motorists who want to pass.

The "Road Rage Reduction Act" is speeding through the Legislature following a 27-10 vote in the Senate on Thursday, two days after the House passed a similar bill by an even wider margin, 109-4. A spokesman for Gov. Jeb Bush said the governor must still evaluate the issue.

The bill requires drivers to stay in the right lane unless they're passing a vehicle or making a left turn. Supporters -- including the Florida Sheriffs Association and Florida Police Benevolent Association -- said the bill would ease traffic flow and make it unnecessary for motorists to dangerously maneuver around slower moving vehicles.

Opponents, including Sen. Evelyn Lynn, R-Ormond Beach, said the bill's emphasis on slower drivers was misplaced.

"We should have our police catching all the offenders of speeding," Lynn pleaded on the Senate floor.

In addition to the proposed fine, the bill calls for a three-point penalty on a driver's record (motorists who accumulate 12 points can lose their license). Bill sponsor Mike Bennett, R-Bradenton, had pitched a four-point penalty but critics said it should be less than the four points assessed to reckless drivers.

The proposed law would allow for many exceptions to the right lane rule, such as using the left lane to avoid hydro-planing in a rain storm or to dodge debris in the roadway. Plus, it doesn't apply when there's no one else on the road.

"You can drive from (Tallahassee) to Miami as long as there's no one behind you," Bennett said.

Still, Sen. Rod Smith, D-Gainesville, called it a "traffic ticket enhancement" act, and Rep. Irv Slosberg, D-Boca Raton, one of the few opponents in the House, said it would increase speeding.

Local motorists were mixed in their reaction to the proposal.

Terry Carter, 26, of Holly Hill liked the idea of separating lanes for faster and slower drivers: "Most older people go slow. I have problems when I get cut off by an older person," Carter said.

Donna Parks, 48, of Volusia County said the bill was necessary: "All truck drivers should be in the right lane. Once when I was merging onto the interstate a truck driver was going so slow he almost ran me off the road," she said.

Naamon Lewis of Holly Hill, though, had doubts.

"We got a lot of people that hog that left lane, but I don't know about making a law," Lewis said. "Good gracious. I don't necessarily agree with the fine and (three) points off your license. I think that's stepping a little too far."

-- Staff Writer Eileen Zaffiro contributed to this report.

jim.haug@news-jrnl.com

SIGNS YOU MIGHT BE AN AGGRESSIVE DRIVER

· Do you get angry at drivers who cut you off, tailgate or go slowly?

· Are you impatient at stoplights or when driving in the slow (right) lane?

· Do you compete with other drivers, drag racing from stoplights or moving ahead in traffic jams?

· Do you punish bad drivers by tailgating, cursing, flashing high-beam headlights or blocking drivers attempting to pass?

SOURCE: Adapted from AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety aggressive driving quiz at www.aaafoundation.org/quizzes


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; rage; road; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-198 next last
To: najida

Especially around town. Despite my highway speed, I don't like to go more than 5 above elsewhere (ok, maybe 10, but only downhill).


121 posted on 04/08/2005 8:48:42 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

The question becomes a legalistic nightmare for motorists AND cops.......ummm, I don't think this means you CAN'T enter the left lane, it means you can't get in the left lane and tool along like you own the road at 55mph. PA has this law and I just love watching the NJ drivers get picked up for violating this and causing traffic jams.


122 posted on 04/08/2005 8:49:06 AM PDT by Safetgiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: technochick99

Good for you, just the right combo of smarts and guts!


123 posted on 04/08/2005 8:51:48 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: KurtAZ

Intersting. However I thought that interstate construction did not start until the 1950's long after the depression. I believe Eisenhower was President and wanted to build what he had seen during his service in Germany during WWII.


124 posted on 04/08/2005 8:52:02 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

Comment #125 Removed by Moderator

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

Comment #128 Removed by Moderator

Comment #129 Removed by Moderator

To: Individual Rights in NJ

He sounds like a safe driver. Let me guess, you're one of the ones we're supposed to watch for, coming through the yellow/red at the last second.


130 posted on 04/08/2005 8:59:28 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

Hmm, yup, you are right...Federal-Aid Highway Act, but Highway building started long before that. The 1954 Act established Federal funding for the improved Interstate system.


131 posted on 04/08/2005 9:02:32 AM PDT by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ

How so?


132 posted on 04/08/2005 9:03:24 AM PDT by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
Eisenhower made a speech about the justification for the program, largely focused on interstae commerce and trucking.

Well then I guess that explains why so many truckers act like I am in their way. Probably even the trucker who is hauling the load of hardwood lumber that I was able to sell to a customer because I got on the interstate and visited the customer at his plant.

133 posted on 04/08/2005 9:05:11 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
That is because the stated situation said the person was already in the right-lane. Where is this person supposed to move to? Besides the statement was made in regards to surface street driving, not Highway driving, which are two completely different animals.
134 posted on 04/08/2005 9:05:33 AM PDT by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Comment #135 Removed by Moderator

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

To: AxelPaulsenJr
I did not say it was the ONLY reason for the Interstates. Military and Public use were also cited but Public use was way down the priority list. Besides, the reason you mentioned is part of Interstate commerce as well, you had a business need that was facilitated by you being able to travel safely to sell your product. And since we all know that business and commerce would be a lot of material and product sitting in a warehouse without the act of selling, you are a driving force behind our economy. That being said, I am sure you were driving a smaller, faster, more maneuverable vehicle than the trucker delivering your hardwood, my point was just to be courteous and understand their job a little. They operate on the logistics of fuel consumption, tire wear, time in transit. That is the reason that you will see a truck on an uphill draft the truck in front, move to the left lane, get half-way up the hill and drop back in behind him. Sure he could drop the hammer and get past the truck in front of him, but the cost in fuel to do that negates the act. He is not there to make your travel any easier, he is doing his job. The laws of diminishing returns operates in his business just as it does yours.
137 posted on 04/08/2005 9:13:40 AM PDT by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ

But if she's going with the flow of traffic, above the speed limit, with no passing possible, if the person is tailgating her, he does have a problem. His impatience is way out of line. There is nowhere for her to go.


138 posted on 04/08/2005 9:13:43 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

Comment #139 Removed by Moderator

Comment #140 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson