I have no problem with life being defended. I have raised funds (volunteer basis) for pro-life groups. I have written letters and newspaper columns that has supported life. And as for the current thread, I support this woman not being killed off against her living will.
But I don't support a blind "life at all costs" stance when it's against a person's rights. I don't support stopping capital punishment. I don't support pacificism.
Now, can you explain why you are so against me asking for facts, not unsupported and unsupportable claims?
Gondring- not one good soul on all the Terri Shindler or Mae M. threads has ever proffered- your blind "life at all costs" stance. Yet, you have argued for the death of Terri& Mae by no uncertain terms. Your supposed "questing for the facts" is the reason for my statements to you. Play the fool with yourself and your ilk, in the mean time- some folks will move heaven & earth to save the lives you would just as soon discard. Now, is that explained enough, or would you prefer the long version? Interesting events today, eh? The next six months will be even more so...