[MACVSOG68]

So returning to the hypothetical scenario, if the "will" were one that most people would regard as an obvious fake, but Greer accepts the word of one 'expert' who proclaims it genuine, would it be legal for Greer to award the decedent's property on that basis?

Why don't you just ask me the question you are really searching answers for? I doubt if it has anything to do with napkins.

[supercat]

Why don't you just ask me the question you are really searching answers for? I doubt if it has anything to do with napkins.

All right. If a trial court judge makes a decision based upon a finding of fact that most people would consider to be clearly and obviously false, does the trial court judge at legally?