All right. If a trial court judge makes a decision based upon a finding of fact that most people would consider to be clearly and obviously false, does the trial court judge at legally?
That is the entire purpose of the appeals courts. And in the case of Greer, the 2d CA was actively involved. Under no circumstances should a poll be taken to assist in the determination of the legality of a judicial decision. The fact that most people do not like a finding of fact is irrelevant, and rightly so. That would be called mob justice. There are two solutions if the judicial reviews do not seem to satisfy, impeachment or not reelecting the judge.