Skip to comments.
Freeper Comments Requested: Custer and Stuart
self
| 4/6/05
| LS
Posted on 04/06/2005 4:47:10 AM PDT by LS
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Thanks guys and gals. Freepers are always a good source of previously un-vented opinions and resources.
1
posted on
04/06/2005 4:47:10 AM PDT
by
LS
To: LS
Please, without re-fighting the Civil War or its causes Oh come on! Can't we please?? Where's WhiskeyPapa? Where's 4ConservativeJustices? Let's rumble :-P
2
posted on
04/06/2005 4:50:46 AM PDT
by
Huck
(Unauthorized mp3 file sharing is THEFT.)
To: LS
Did you just watch "They died with their boots on" on TCM this morning? (Like I did?)
3
posted on
04/06/2005 4:51:12 AM PDT
by
leadpenny
To: LS
--I presume you have read Son of the Morning Star---?
4
posted on
04/06/2005 4:56:00 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(urban dwellers don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm)
To: LS
One mission of cavalry is to gather information on the enemy. Both Custer with the Lakota and Stewart at Gettysburg had this as a primary mission. Both sought glory, not the success of their commander's mission.
In both cases the orders were poorly written.
If memory serves me. After a big fire on the Little Big Horn battlefield an extensive archaeological investigation was performed. Specifically with metal detectors. One of the findings was large quantities of fired cartridges. IMHO Custer lost because he ran out of ammunition. Remember his last message out was "send up the packs" (ammunition pack mules). Whereas Bannon(?) had the pack mules and could continue to fight.
At Gettysburg, Lee lost because he ignored Longstreet and executed Pickett's Charge. Stewart's folly precipitated the battle, it did not determine it's outcome. Also if Hill had attacked aggressively on the first day, Gettysburg would have been a different fight.
5
posted on
04/06/2005 5:09:51 AM PDT
by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
To: LS
6
posted on
04/06/2005 5:13:25 AM PDT
by
kalee
To: fireforeffect
"Both sought glory, not the success of their commander's mission."
Bump. Egos that were too big for their saddles.
7
posted on
04/06/2005 5:15:10 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
To: Huck; 4ConservativeJustices; lentulusgracchus; GOPcapitalist
Where's WhiskeyPapa? Where's 4ConservativeJustices?Walt is a little tied up right now.
To: stainlessbanner
Sorry, I get nostalgic sometimes. Ever seen a movie called "Skin Game" with James Garner and Lou Gossett, Jr? It's from the 70s. Pretty funny flick set in the days of bloody Kansas. If you ever run across it, check it out.
9
posted on
04/06/2005 5:36:00 AM PDT
by
Huck
(Unauthorized mp3 file sharing is THEFT.)
To: Huck
No need to rumble, we're friends. Just a difference of opinion on an issue or two, but still conservatives ;o)
10
posted on
04/06/2005 5:51:05 AM PDT
by
4CJ
(Good-bye Henry LeeII. Rest well my FRiend. Good-bye Terri. We'll miss you both.)
To: LS
To: Huck; stainlessbanner
I've seen 'Skin Game' - they attempt to con everybody!
12
posted on
04/06/2005 5:52:47 AM PDT
by
4CJ
(Good-bye Henry LeeII. Rest well my FRiend. Good-bye Terri. We'll miss you both.)
To: stainlessbanner
Last I heard Walt was looking for a stable roommate.
13
posted on
04/06/2005 5:54:38 AM PDT
by
4CJ
(Good-bye Henry LeeII. Rest well my FRiend. Good-bye Terri. We'll miss you both.)
To: stainlessbanner
What happened to Wlat? Haven't seen him around for a while.
14
posted on
04/06/2005 5:55:40 AM PDT
by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: LS
The best analysis of whether Jeb Stuart exceeded his orders during his Gettysburg Campaign raid is Dave Powell's article in Gettysburg Magazine. Dave basically concludes that Stuart did NOT exceed his orders, that in fact Stuart exercised the discretion Lee's orders gave him. Whether Stuart should have gone off raiding is another question.
To: LS
Custer and Stuart were both very able calvery officers as well as being brave men. It's very easy to judge military errors in retrospect. Custer's orders were vague, but Terry had enough confidence in Custer to let him decide for himself the best course of action to round up the Indians and prevent them from escaping.
Custer and Stuart died as brave soldiers in the service of their countries.
To: LS
Part of Custer's defeat was due to the Indian forces being better armed. The battlefield archeology showed that the Lakota forces had significant numbers of repeating rifles while Custer's men were armed mainly with single shot carbines that were prone to jam.
To: ladtx
To: rellimpank
Yes. I'd say this fits more with the "Lakota Moon" school than the Utley school.
19
posted on
04/06/2005 7:17:22 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: fireforeffect
My impression also was that both exceeded their orders, especially Custer. But I'm open to other evidence. The archeological evidence you speak of is in Fox's book---a very persuasive book.
20
posted on
04/06/2005 7:18:29 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson