It sure felt good here in Kansas to vote for that amendment and see it pass. Now on to the federal government...
1 posted on
04/05/2005 8:57:52 PM PDT by
srm913
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: srm913
"With the victory, Kansas becomes the 18th state to incorporate such a ban in its constitution. Thirteen of those states, including Missouri, passed similar amendments just last year. Alabama, South Dakota and Tennessee have votes scheduled for 2006, and legislation has been introduced in 14 other states to put such a measure on the ballot, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures."
Oh man, this is going to drive 'em nuts over at the DU. LOL. PJ is going to have plenty of material to work with this morning.
When do ya s'pose they will get the hint? Never most likely. Not as long as we have upstanding judges, like the recent one in Calif that ruled same sex contracts did not interfere with their states constitutional amendment on marriage passed last year. Still ya gotta love it when they take one in the shorts.
134 posted on
04/06/2005 7:09:33 AM PDT by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!)
To: srm913
I may decide to move to Kansas. You guys got a conservative governor, reps, senators? Ain't got no liberals do you? Well, a minority few for fun I guess, but not a majority like commie WA state here where I am now.
135 posted on
04/06/2005 7:47:01 AM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(Freedom, dying one court and one socialist democrat decision at a time.)
To: srm913
Headline is just a LITTLE misleading.
138 posted on
04/06/2005 8:48:32 AM PDT by
Redbob
To: srm913
Does Rosie know about this? :)
140 posted on
04/06/2005 9:19:08 AM PDT by
tatsmom
To: srm913
Doesn't matter.
This will be appealed and some activist judge will toss this in the trash in a skinny minute.
Hasn't this point gotten home yet?
To: srm913
Kansas voters gave a resounding yes Tuesday to a constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage, providing what supporters hope is momentum for more bans nationwide. I thought the MSM told us that passing such bans were to controversial and there would be public backlash if we tried.
To: srm913
The vote is not reflective of the typical Kansan, said Steve Brown of Prairie Village, a member of Kansans for Fairness, a group that worked to defeat the amendment.Sure. The 70% are just a small fringe group. Poooolease! Get a grip on reality, dude!
No one in their right mind sees a perverse, dysfunctional sex fetish as a "marriage."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson