Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
Either executive should have stepped in and called a halt.

Don't you think that would have been grounds for impeachment?

IMHO, the correct thing for the government to do would've been to spare her life and then allow the legislative branches at both the state and federal levels ample time to fix the law.

If Terri had benefited from that, would that have made the law an ex post facto law?

Any lawyers here who can answer either or both questions?

373 posted on 04/05/2005 11:52:11 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: EveningStar
"Don't you think that would have been grounds for impeachment?"

Perhaps. It's a risk.

"If Terri had benefited from that, would that have made the law an ex post facto law?"

Doubtful.

377 posted on 04/06/2005 12:19:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson