Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed F/A-22 wins approval for full-rate output
Reuters ^ | Apr 1, 2005

Posted on 04/04/2005 3:24:43 PM PDT by Magnum44

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Prophet in the wilderness
Is that a real picture of the FB- 22 ? or just a modified picture ?

Are you serious? The F/A-22 prototypes are actual flying. The F/B-22 is just an artists rendering, because at this point it is just a concept.

41 posted on 04/04/2005 10:20:58 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
It looks like they can still use the nose section on the F 22 for the FB - 22 to save development cost for the FB - 22.

That's pretty much the whole point. The USAF is talking about buying just 50 or so of the F/B-22. It would be very hard to justify 50 planes that are designed from the ground up. A 50 plane derivative is enouogh to be worthwhile while being profitable for the manufacturer.

42 posted on 04/04/2005 10:24:36 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
The F - 22 pilot can see his adversaries at least ( correct me if I am wrong ) 250 miles away, and can see his adversaries before they can see him, and launch weapons from 250 miles away ( launch and forget , on to the next target ) and they will never know what hit them.
Even though the F - 22 is very capable of a dog fight, it is not necessary with the F - 22 because the pilot ( hopefully ) will be able to take out his adversaries before there is a need for a dogfight.
43 posted on 04/04/2005 10:34:53 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
ouch..... that would hurt.... lol.
44 posted on 04/04/2005 10:41:10 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I meant the picture of the FB - 22.
Then again,, never mind, lol... the FB - 22 is not even in production ( officially... that is .... one can only guess .. right ? ).
45 posted on 04/04/2005 10:45:00 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
YF-23


46 posted on 04/05/2005 8:10:03 AM PDT by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

The F-22 was superior in low speed maneuver, and projected cost.

The F-23 was superior in range, RCS, Speed, payload, and high altitude maneuver.

At high speed, you are G limited, and rather small wings are adequate for more turn rate than you can stand.


47 posted on 04/05/2005 9:37:54 AM PDT by donmeaker (Burn the UN flag publicly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I doubt that they will do the FB-22, too much money ... look at the F-16xl, great plane, but not worth the effort.
The plane that I think stands a chance of not going anywhere is the F-35. Probably get a few, and then as air superiority is achieved, switch to A-10s. The F-35 can't carry alot as is.


48 posted on 04/05/2005 2:18:13 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: brooklin

The F-35 is planned to be a low observable the first couple days of the war while SAMs and bandits are a factor. Once air superiority is achieved you add external pylons and turn it into a bomb truck. STOVL versions will still be limited in payload, but CTOL variants shouldn't be.


49 posted on 04/05/2005 9:40:53 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson