Skip to comments.
Lockheed F/A-22 wins approval for full-rate output
Reuters ^
| Apr 1, 2005
Posted on 04/04/2005 3:24:43 PM PDT by Magnum44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: Prophet in the wilderness
Is that a real picture of the FB- 22 ? or just a modified picture ? Are you serious? The F/A-22 prototypes are actual flying. The F/B-22 is just an artists rendering, because at this point it is just a concept.
41
posted on
04/04/2005 10:20:58 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
It looks like they can still use the nose section on the F 22 for the FB - 22 to save development cost for the FB - 22. That's pretty much the whole point. The USAF is talking about buying just 50 or so of the F/B-22. It would be very hard to justify 50 planes that are designed from the ground up. A 50 plane derivative is enouogh to be worthwhile while being profitable for the manufacturer.
42
posted on
04/04/2005 10:24:36 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Pukin Dog
The F - 22 pilot can see his adversaries at least ( correct me if I am wrong ) 250 miles away, and can see his adversaries before they can see him, and launch weapons from 250 miles away ( launch and forget , on to the next target ) and they will never know what hit them.
Even though the F - 22 is very capable of a dog fight, it is not necessary with the F - 22 because the pilot ( hopefully ) will be able to take out his adversaries before there is a need for a dogfight.
43
posted on
04/04/2005 10:34:53 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Paleo Conservative
ouch..... that would hurt.... lol.
44
posted on
04/04/2005 10:41:10 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Paleo Conservative
I meant the picture of the FB - 22.
Then again,, never mind, lol... the FB - 22 is not even in production ( officially... that is .... one can only guess .. right ? ).
45
posted on
04/04/2005 10:45:00 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
YF-23
To: Prophet in the wilderness
The F-22 was superior in low speed maneuver, and projected cost.
The F-23 was superior in range, RCS, Speed, payload, and high altitude maneuver.
At high speed, you are G limited, and rather small wings are adequate for more turn rate than you can stand.
47
posted on
04/05/2005 9:37:54 AM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Burn the UN flag publicly.)
To: Paleo Conservative
I doubt that they will do the FB-22, too much money ... look at the F-16xl, great plane, but not worth the effort.
The plane that I think stands a chance of not going anywhere is the F-35. Probably get a few, and then as air superiority is achieved, switch to A-10s. The F-35 can't carry alot as is.
48
posted on
04/05/2005 2:18:13 PM PDT
by
brooklin
To: brooklin
The F-35 is planned to be a low observable the first couple days of the war while SAMs and bandits are a factor. Once air superiority is achieved you add external pylons and turn it into a bomb truck. STOVL versions will still be limited in payload, but CTOL variants shouldn't be.
49
posted on
04/05/2005 9:40:53 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson