With all the knife-twisting around Easter Sunday by the left-leaning Terri-haters club, you all may have missed, as I did, some GREAT posts, and at least one great thread by WL_law, who reaaaaalllllllly seems to understand the 'inner Michael', and what occurred...
For example, excerpts from posts:
...Michael, the sociopath, played along with the game, which kept Terri's parents in a state of non-accusative cognitive dissonance.
Once the game was "won", meaning the lawsuit had borne fruit, THEN Michael -- in his sociopathic victory over the cognitively dissonant parents -- turned the tables, and upped the ante.
Michael raised his bet on himself -- not only could he beat the attempted investigation by bringing Terri's parents close to him, but now he could KEEP the money, get rid of Terri, and cut the parents (and their dream of caring for Terri) loose.
Only a sociopath would take that chance. And only a sociopath could win that bet. [more]
.....AND ALSO this excerpt....
... Here's what Michael testified: he and Terri were watching a movie, and she said that she wouldn't want to go through what the character in the movie went through.
So it was not a direct assertion of her wishes -- it was an indirect reflection of her state-of-mind based on her experience of watching the movie.
Providing just enough indirection to avoid the heresay objection -- and just enough proof to provide idiot Judge Greer to reach the conclusion he did.
An artful dodge, if I must say so, but not so difficult for a psychopathological husband. [more]
.....AND ALSO THIS THREAD....
...thanks WL_law!
