In 2001, a young San Francisco man by the name of Robert Wendland died. Mr. Wendland suffered profound physical and cognitive disabilities following an automobile accident in 1993. Mr. Wendland died of pneumonia while his mother continued to fight his wifes efforts to end his life via the removal of his feeding tube.Some stunning and ominous parallels exist between Mr. Wendlands case and the case of Terri Schiavo and they merit consideration. Rose Wendland, Roberts wife, had petitioned the courts for the right to remove his feeding tube, stating that he had a right to live without tubes and medicines. She, like Michael Schiavo, argued that aggressive therapy was not in Roberts interest and that his death by dehydration and starvation would be peaceful and dignified.
Like Terri Schiavo, Robert Wendland demonstrated convincing abilities and awareness. It is said that he was able to negotiate a wheelchair through hospital corridors on his own. Yet, Rose Wendland insisted that he be let go, much to the opposition of Roberts own mother, Florence Wendland.
In startling likeness to Michael Schiavo, Rose Wendland denied her spouse therapy, kept him from public view and instructed his caregivers not to disclose any information about his condition to his own mother. Even the absence of an advanced directive bears similarity to Terri Schiavos case.
In the end, Robert Wendland died of pneumonia (A death some experts would later call exit protocol) even as his legal battle waged on.
The similarities are actually a bit too close for my liking.Reeks of agenda(dare i say conspiracy?). Theres no doubt that the people who embrace the culture of death contact one another(same "expert" witnesses at many trials).It would seem theres a game plan they have to be followed,making the target of death seem like less of a person.