Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
The three docs that said PVS were more credible than the ones that said not so.

Ah, yes, Cranford. Who has publicly said PVS patients and Alzheimer's patients have no constitutional rights.

113 posted on 04/02/2005 9:37:48 AM PST by syriacus (Weird George Felos repeatedly flicked his tongue out his gaping mouth when lying to the press 3/31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus

Sorry, but anyone who says that people who are PVS or have Alzheimers should not have consitutional rights are not credible one bit IMO!


115 posted on 04/02/2005 9:42:59 AM PST by Halls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus
Ah, yes, Cranford. Who has publicly said PVS patients and Alzheimer's patients have no constitutional rights.

OK, whats wrong with the other two other than you disagree with them? That still leaves it 2:1 in favor of pvs. Face it, you probably wouldnt care whether they all said she was in pvs. You dont think anyone has a right to die, that is perhaps unless they are a judge you disagree with.

116 posted on 04/02/2005 9:45:21 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson