No, Greer made an erroneous decision based on the facts in my view, helped along by poor lawyering on one side. Greer made a finding that was not legally errant, it was within his discretion. That is why the Greer decison was legally bullet proof.
"Greer made an erroneous decision based on the facts in my view, helped along by poor lawyering on one side."
====
There was NO convincing evidence anywhere close to beyond reasonable doubt about Terri's wishes. There was also no "clear and convincing" evidence about Terri's condition.