Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion

No, Greer made an erroneous decision based on the facts in my view, helped along by poor lawyering on one side. Greer made a finding that was not legally errant, it was within his discretion. That is why the Greer decison was legally bullet proof.


103 posted on 04/01/2005 8:59:31 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Torie

"Greer made an erroneous decision based on the facts in my view, helped along by poor lawyering on one side."


====

There was NO convincing evidence anywhere close to beyond reasonable doubt about Terri's wishes. There was also no "clear and convincing" evidence about Terri's condition.


114 posted on 04/01/2005 9:04:17 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson