Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie

"Greer made an erroneous decision based on the facts in my view, helped along by poor lawyering on one side."


====

There was NO convincing evidence anywhere close to beyond reasonable doubt about Terri's wishes. There was also no "clear and convincing" evidence about Terri's condition.


114 posted on 04/01/2005 9:04:17 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
you have not figured out the situation.
terri was placed in a hospice as a PR and cost effective
way to save the malpractice trust.
you can always justify pulling the tube
on a hospice patient but trying it on a
nursing home patient.
126 posted on 04/01/2005 9:11:27 PM PST by BurtTpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

The finder of fact can give such weight to conflicting testimony as the finder of fact wishes. Greer was God, in practical effect. The abuse of discretion standard as a basis of appeal almost NEVER succeeds. You don't like it? Change the law.


161 posted on 04/01/2005 9:23:32 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson