To: Cincinatus' Wife
It will cost additional hundreds of millions of dollars to "de-orbit" the Hubble. Why not sell the Hubble to Richard Branson for $1, since he has developed a cheaper method of going from here to there.
The private contractor just might be able to salvage the Hubble, which the gummint cannot. It's worth a go.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "Terri Schiavo, Requiescat in Pacem"
2 posted on
04/01/2005 5:32:50 AM PST by
Congressman Billybob
(Proud to be a FORMER member of the Bar of the US Supreme Court since July, 2004.)
To: Congressman Billybob
Interesting thought! Though I think this one will be NASA's clean up job.
But, more and more technology and services are going to be bought from the private sector.
To: Congressman Billybob
I like that. Salvage rights. Private space exploration will ultimately be the way to go. The free market will always find the most expeditious means of solving a problem.
6 posted on
04/01/2005 5:54:01 AM PST by
6SJ7
To: Congressman Billybob
Richard Branson developed a way to get into space, but he did not develop a way to get into orbit.
Hubble is the size of a bus and is moving faster than a bullet.
7 posted on
04/01/2005 5:55:59 AM PST by
kidd
To: Congressman Billybob
OOPS! You had the idea first. I should have read the whole thread first.
17 posted on
04/01/2005 6:22:37 AM PST by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: Congressman Billybob
OOPS! You had the idea first. I should have read the whole thread first.
22 posted on
04/01/2005 6:25:26 AM PST by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: Congressman Billybob
The private contractor just might be able to salvage the Hubble, which the gummint cannot. It's worth a go.Sorry. The lifting capability just does not exist in the private sector.
To: Congressman Billybob
I was thinking the same thing, sell it to someone, I had thought of Rutan et al, or even to the Russians. I am not an expert on orbital mechanics, and I know its more complicated than it sounds, but how about just sending a little booser to boost it into a slightly higher orbit for the time being, then put the thing into sleep mode or something. NASA doesn't even have to do it, let someone else handle it.
43 posted on
04/01/2005 7:30:09 AM PST by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: Congressman Billybob
Why not sell the Hubble to Richard Branson for $1, since he has developed a cheaper method of going from here to there. He hasn't.
52 posted on
04/01/2005 7:41:13 AM PST by
r9etb
To: Congressman Billybob
Or sign a contract to lease the telescope to a corporation, foundation, or university. New technology on the drawing boards makes even ground based telescopes a viable hubble option.
83 posted on
04/01/2005 8:31:10 AM PST by
mission9
(Be a citizen worth living for, in a Nation worth dying for...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson