general_re,
I believe that your points are well taken. I apologize for any rush to judgment on my part. I do believe that a dialogue predicated upon "separating legal correctness from moral correctness" is worthwhile. I suggest that neither one of us categorically reject an unpleasant opinion by the other but focus instead on the scope of supporting material. Deal?
Warm regards,
TS
The evofreep gang that is traveling together on this thread is not interested in 'deals'. It's not taught by Adam Graham... How To Win Online Debates .
This link should help you and others recognize who you are debating with, and why you need not bother.
Love to, but I'm "not interested in deals". Or so I'm told ;)
Let us begin by stipulating that what happened in the Schiavo case was an immoral outcome, and proceed from there.