Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US tells India, drop dead
Rediff ^ | March 28, 2005 | Kanchan Gupta

Posted on 03/31/2005 2:37:47 AM PST by Gengis Khan

US tells India, drop dead

March 28, 2005

A friend, usually upbeat about India-US relations, sent me an angry mail over the weekend after President George Bush called up Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on the evening of March 25 to inform him that the US had decided to supply F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in an interview to The Washington Post, "dismissed concerns" about the fallout of the American decision. The mail reads:

"lovely easter gift to india from the us.

moral: proliferate nukes, threaten us interests everywhere, be terror hub, and get rewarded for it. this has been north korea's experience, china's experience, saudi arabia's experience, and pakistan's experience.

suck up to the us, desperately crave its goodwill, allow its odious conversion machine to dictate terms to you, and get slapped on the face. this is india's experience.

simple solution for india: proliferate nuke and missile technology to anybody who wants it, especially taiwan and japan. this will immediately get american respect, much as pokhran-ii did."

The issues that arise from USA's decision to strengthen Pakistan's strike power, I feel, are much larger than merely seeking or getting "American respect." A nation whose civilisational history stretches back to 5,000 years, that is more than Americans can count without a Texas Instruments TI-83, and whose billion-plus population is not dependent on American wheat surplus of the PL 480 variety, can do without "American respect." Thank you very much, but America is welcome to stuff its "respect" in a hot dog.

The larger concerns are two-fold. First, Washington's mollycoddling of Pakistan, a rogue state that has not only proliferated cross-border jihadi terrorism but also spawned an underground bazaar where it has been hawking weapons of mass destruction to other rogue states. Second, the arms race that will follow America's dubious deal, with both India and Pakistan upping their defence expenditure at the cost of social welfare spending.

A third aspect that merits comment is the glib manner in which Rice, during the joint press conference she addressed along with Minister for External Affairs Natwar Singh during her brief stopover in New Delhi earlier this month, waved away any 'announcement' of an American deal on F-16s for Pakistan in the immediate future. Perhaps time and space are extremely elastic for those who wax eloquent on "absent morals" of others.

It is immaterial whether or not Pakistan has been assisting the US in pursuing its "war against terror" -- ask those who are involved in the war, including intelligence operatives, and they will tell you Islamabad has been leading Washington down the garden path -- what is material is that India must protect its own national interest. There is little evidence to show that Pakistan has given up the path of terror; nor is there reason to believe that Islamabad is genuinely interested in peace.

If you have any doubts, look at the daily acts of terror in Jammu and Kashmir; the insidious growth of ISI modules in the Northeast; and, the export of jehadi fundamentalism to India via Nepal. Nothing has changed in the last one year, never mind peaceniks who are making silly asses of themselves.

The absurd claim put out by unnamed sources in the US State Department that the F-16s form part of American assistance to Pakistan to wage war on terrorism is as laughable as the lollypop of advanced fighter jets (F-18s, no less) and nuclear power reactors that has been offered to India. "What the Americans have announced is the actual, physical delivery of F-16s to Pakistan and a bunch of nice promises for India," a foreign office official in New Delhi has said underscoring the absurdity.

No less absurd is the claim made by "senior administration officials" at a background briefing for "select journalists" that the military assistance to Pakistan's military ruler General Pervez Musharraf was aimed at ensuring "a fully democratic, economically promising Pakistan, that feels secure and is thus at peace with its neighbours."

The officials might as well have added that it is inconsequential the US's favourite tin pot dictator is to blame for the runaway basement bomb programmes in North Korea, Iran and Libya, among others. Boys will be boys, you see, naughty and mischievous; what's a component here and a blueprint there?

Those nations that have committed the mistake of trusting the US have come to grief, and how. It will be disastrous if India makes a similar mistake. If the UPA government believes in what it says, that India is a sovereign nation free to make its own choices, then it should not touch the American promise with a bargepole.

The Pakistanis can seek satisfaction in saving 5,000 jobs at Lockheed Martin Corp, Indians need not lose sleep over the plight of unemployed workers in Texas. In fact, it will be fun to watch Bush and Rice squirm, which they shall, if Manmohan Singh and his team look through their alleged offer and go ahead with selecting the next generation, multi-purpose jets from what has been offered by the French, the Swedes and the Russians.

If they choose to be charmed by the Americans, then India might as well say goodbye to its sovereign identity and become another client state of the US like Pakistan has become.

PS: At the launch of journalist Wilson John's book Pakistan's Nuclear Underworld: An Investigation, a devastating expose of how A Q Khan and his bosses in khaki went around hawking nuclear know-how for a fistful of dollars, in New Delhi last week, a former foreign secretary, mindful of the presence of two diplomats from the US mission in the audience, charged the Americans with "doubletalk and duplicity" on illicit nuclear proliferation by the Pakistanis.

Later, one of the American diplomats, fuming over being shown up so bluntly, accosted him and told him that he had been "offensive and insulting to my country" and "you could have been more nuanced without being inaccurate." Retorted the former diplomat: "We are a free country. We can say what we want… I couldn't care less for pretensions of the American empire."

Let's order a second hot dog!


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; agitprop; america; bangladesh; brazil; brics; bs; castesystem; china; dramaqueening; f16; geopolitics; hotdogs; hyperbole; india; kanchangupta; lockheedmartin; pakistan; rediff; russia; southafrica; southasia; totalbs; us; victimology; waahwaahwaah; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-254 next last
To: Gengis Khan
"That too when India and the US are natural allies."

I understand your howling, a hit dog always does. But I don't believe America will sit still if India were happened to be attacked from either Pakistan or China. Remember also, 9/10ths of technology's success comes in the ability to use it.

Still, it was a dumb move to equip the Paks with the AC's.

101 posted on 03/31/2005 7:03:49 AM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
Once Mushy is assassinated, the US will rue its decision to ally itself with Pakistan. Unfortunately, since the Marshall plan, US foreign policy has been short sighted.

See post 16 - his observation is very astute.
102 posted on 03/31/2005 7:07:28 AM PST by razoroccam (Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Wasn't the LAVI a joint US-Israeli project???IIRC,Lockheed Martin was involved.

Yes, General Dynamics (before the Lockheed buyout) provided wing assemblies. It was part of the Israeli requirements for buying GD F-16's, IIRC.

103 posted on 03/31/2005 7:08:15 AM PST by ScreamingFist (Peace through Ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911

"Interesting read in yesterday's Wall Street Journal about this very subject. Their take was India wasn't as disappointed as portrayed since, in fact, India has been approved to buy the latest, more up to date fighter, the FA18. And in more quantity. Is this incorrect?"

That is what I heard also. Let's face it, if it wasn't us who supplied Pakistan it would be Russia or China. We're friendly with both countries right now and I do not see the whole relationship with India being soured over this matter.


104 posted on 03/31/2005 7:12:01 AM PST by quantfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

You will be the one howling when Pakistan pulls an Iran on you guys.

As for American help, I wont be so sure nor would I want to count on US help.


105 posted on 03/31/2005 7:13:01 AM PST by Gengis Khan ("There is no glory in incomplete action." -- Gengis Khan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: quantfive

Umm,Pakistan is getting over a 100 jets from China irrespective of the F-16 deal & Russia has to big a market in India to lose by selling to Pakistan.


106 posted on 03/31/2005 7:14:42 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
"Let's order a second hot dog!" I thought Indians were vegans

This was a veggie dog.

107 posted on 03/31/2005 7:24:26 AM PST by A. Pole (Rudyard Kipling: "If any question why we died Tell them, because our fathers lied.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
"You will be the one howling when Pakistan pulls an Iran on you guys."

You think WE worry over Pak? Ha! India can handle her if she gets too messy.

"As for American help, I wont be so sure nor would I want to count on US help."

You wouldn't know that and rightly so - until the time it's NEEDED. One NEVER displays a weapon nor a strategy until it is time to use it or unless they're willing to use it to its ultimate.

108 posted on 03/31/2005 7:28:25 AM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Hey I didn't say that.. I am on India's side in this....


109 posted on 03/31/2005 7:41:54 AM PST by Awestruck (Yes, prayer does help and it is important~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

why do I keep getting lumped in with that ridiculous statement.. mine was one of support for India.


110 posted on 03/31/2005 7:42:42 AM PST by Awestruck (Yes, prayer does help and it is important~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Yes but the avionics and mission software will not be
what the USAF/NATO have..


111 posted on 03/31/2005 7:43:16 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
Akin to that if you remove all that diplomatic smooth talk.

Yep...The White House wants India to drop dead. Its our policy that India is run over by Pakistani's... Yep...Yessireee... *cough*

112 posted on 03/31/2005 7:45:38 AM PST by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: smith288

Tell me its not. Go ahead. Humor me.


113 posted on 03/31/2005 7:48:51 AM PST by Gengis Khan ("There is no glory in incomplete action." -- Gengis Khan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

That's scant comfort & the Pakis have requested that they want Blk 52s with AMRAAMs.Remains to be seen whether they get it.


114 posted on 03/31/2005 7:49:03 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911
So you believe the Pak's are, indeed suicidal?

Yes, as evidenced by their actions over the past 60 odd year.
115 posted on 03/31/2005 7:49:34 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
India is a Soviet/Russia client state and would not support the US in Iraq.

India and Russia will always be allies because they have long borders with a common foe -- China.
116 posted on 03/31/2005 7:50:37 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
The Indians have sucked up to Russia and or China for decades

Are you nutz???? India sucking up to China??? India had a war with China in 1962 and lost territory to China. When India tested her nukes, her defence minister stated that the nukes were directed against CHINA.
117 posted on 03/31/2005 7:51:45 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Awestruck

"Hey I didn't say that.. I am on India's side in this....

why do I keep getting lumped in with that ridiculous statement.. mine was one of support for India."


LOL! Sorry about that.
The comments were not exactly directed at you. Just that you were part of the discussion :-D


118 posted on 03/31/2005 7:52:19 AM PST by Gengis Khan ("There is no glory in incomplete action." -- Gengis Khan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We'll counter with free Lo-Jack and OnStar..


119 posted on 03/31/2005 7:53:23 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Atilla_the_Hun
Paki's are 'tough' and threatening versus the vegan 'outsourcing' Indians.

Ah, the same, stupid conclusion drawn in the late 60s. And completely WRONG. The 'tough' and threatening Pakis lost THREE wars with the 'vegan' Indians. And they only fought three wars with India. The "tough" Pakis got their land dismembered by Indians in 1971 when India had to face threats from China as well. The "tough" Pakis got their butts kicked by the 'vegan' Indians when they tried their little Kargil adventure.
120 posted on 03/31/2005 7:54:34 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson