Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: watchdog_writer

While Jeb, imo, would not be in dereliction of duty by the letter as today of law -- he would must definitely be in dereliction of higher duty of law. That same kind of higher duty as understood and acted upon by our Founders during the the *by-the-then-letter-illegal* Revolution.


15 posted on 03/30/2005 6:56:36 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
he would must definitely be in dereliction of higher duty of law

That "higher law" being defined by you, of course. And your kind. Who needs the Constitution when we have those who believe in a "higher law?"

53 posted on 03/30/2005 7:34:15 PM PST by freedumb2003 (First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women (HJ Simpson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson