Skip to comments.
Mystery of 1918 Flu Pandemic Solved . . . (Birds !)
Observer/Guardian ^
| 2/6/2004
| Tim Radford, Science Editor
Posted on 03/30/2005 12:12:24 PM PST by ex-Texan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
03/30/2005 12:12:24 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
Should make it easier for the Twelve Monkeys to complete their mission.
2
posted on
03/30/2005 12:13:28 PM PST
by
Paloma_55
To: ex-Texan
3
posted on
03/30/2005 12:15:06 PM PST
by
TheBigB
("She's the kind of girl you bring home to Mother... if Mother is a cigaretty, retired hooker.")
To: ex-Texan
So it killed millions in 1918, but was first found in 1933? I guess people were too busy dying in 1918 to look in the mirror.
4
posted on
03/30/2005 12:18:49 PM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Constitution Day
To: Paloma_55
Good movie.......Brad Pitt as an insane environmentalist....is that redundant?.......or tridundant?.....
6
posted on
03/30/2005 12:21:10 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(The South seceded over refusal to end slavery. Blue states want to secede for the same reason......)
To: ex-Texan
..an ferret? ...not just domestic ducks/chickens or wild geese.
7
posted on
03/30/2005 12:22:13 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
To: Paloma_55
Mystery of 1918 Flu Pandemic Solved . . . (Birds !)
8
posted on
03/30/2005 12:23:20 PM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Rodney King
Say what - how would looking in a mirror help see a virus? Your mirror must have a lot higher power magnification than the ones in my bathroom ;).
9
posted on
03/30/2005 12:24:33 PM PST
by
ThePythonicCow
(To err is human; to moo is bovine)
To: ex-Texan
The solution is a bit more obvious than that. It was a particular nasty strain (which happens every dozen years or so) and our medical knowledge and techniques weren't that good. If the 1918 strain popped up again next flu season it would be a very bad flu season, because it was a very nasty strain, but it wouldn't be anywhere near as bad as it was in 1918, our medicine can handle that beast now.
10
posted on
03/30/2005 12:25:17 PM PST
by
discostu
(quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
To: ThePythonicCow
Say what - how would looking in a mirror help see a virus? Your mirror must have a lot higher power magnification than the ones in my bathroom ;). Well, presumeably the flu was found in 1918 when people were dropping like flies from it.
11
posted on
03/30/2005 12:28:51 PM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: ex-Texan
I heard this about 50 yeas ago from my dad. He had heard it from his professors some time before that. Of course, this article points out a closer connection.
12
posted on
03/30/2005 12:29:28 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: discostu
You're right.
Also most of the afflicted died from secondary infections because back then they didn't have antibiotics.
13
posted on
03/30/2005 12:31:13 PM PST
by
Ceebass
To: ex-Texan
Sir John said: "Bird viruses recognise different receptors than human viruses. So when they transfer into the human population they have got to change their binding capacity. With the Asian flu and Hong Kong flu in 1957 and 1968, we think we know how they do that. "But in the case of the 1918-1957 viruses, where the Asian and Hong Kong flu changed, these ones stayed the same: they looked just like the avian progenitor. So the mystery is: what happened to allow them to infect humans?"
One part of the mystery solved, another mystery created:"what happened to allow them to infect humans?"
Also, why did the 1918 pandemic after killing 20-40m people after 18 months suddenly disappear globally?
14
posted on
03/30/2005 12:31:44 PM PST
by
baseball_fan
(Thank you Vets)
To: ex-Texan
My grandfather died of the 1918 flu in Stafford Kansas. My father was only a few months old. There were not enough coffins to bury people in so they used whatever was at hand, They had to break his legs to get him into a girl sized coffin. Terrible times.
15
posted on
03/30/2005 12:34:18 PM PST
by
Lee Heggy
(Sorry, I don't do Windows.)
To: skinkinthegrass
16
posted on
03/30/2005 12:36:04 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
(Mathew 7:1 through 6)
To: Tijeras_Slim
Very interesting! Thanks very much.
There's some great science being done out there.
17
posted on
03/30/2005 12:41:12 PM PST
by
Constitution Day
("You guys need a pallet of paper bags to breathe into, I swear.")
To: ex-Texan
Interesting. My father survived the "Spanish Flu" in 1918 and has never caught any strain of flu since then.
18
posted on
03/30/2005 12:42:51 PM PST
by
1066AD
To: Ceebass
Yep, didn't have antibiotics, were really still learning germ theory, didn't have the transportation infrastructure to move medical supplies (especially perishable supplies) around quickly and effectively, and just weren't ready for anything major. A modern day third world country probably has better medical practices than any place in the world in 1918.
19
posted on
03/30/2005 12:49:24 PM PST
by
discostu
(quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
To: ex-Texan
The H5N1 virus or bird flu infects them all.WOW!..that's interesting, a pandemic plague.
20
posted on
03/30/2005 12:49:41 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson