Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/30/2005 9:07:26 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Valin

Good article.
Thanks.


2 posted on 03/30/2005 9:11:10 AM PST by tiamat (Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jaykay

T.R.O.P.


3 posted on 03/30/2005 9:17:23 AM PST by milemark (Proud to be an infidel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

Ahhh, so they are terrorists because they are sore losers? It all comes clearly to me now...


5 posted on 03/30/2005 9:20:38 AM PST by Hegemony Cricket (You are witnessing History in the making! (We are having to rewrite prehistory))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin
Fascinating. Insensate hatred of the status quo is a characteristic of the young whether they are its beneficiaries or not. So is utopianism. So is a need for romantic self-identification. It is these that characterize a political radical whether he or she be Bolshevik, Anarchist, Nazi, or in this case a weird amalgam of fascism and violent and militant Muslim.

Most people grow out of it before they hurt someone. Some people do not. Some end up so fond of it that they cannot imagine life without it. These ideology addicts are pretty easy to identify - if the question "what have you ever built?" is answered by "the System has to be destroyed first," then it's definitive.

What is most fascinating about communist rhetoric is the timeless nature of its resentment and the ingenuity with which it finds fault with all aspects of a current self-defined "system." It is a sad, stunted creativity and a total waste of energy, but it is so satisfying on a visceral level that it has the habituating properties of a powerful drug. It will be with us long after its parent ideology has faded into the obscurity of failure, and it is no surprise that other radicals find it so congenial.

8 posted on 03/30/2005 9:30:16 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin
So anti-western liberalism, born in the west, is somewhat responsible for Islamic Radicalism.

This does not surprise me.

9 posted on 03/30/2005 9:30:21 AM PST by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

Wow... now this is some very tasty food for thought. If there are many Moslems with the author's point of view, then there is hope.


12 posted on 03/30/2005 9:38:43 AM PST by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

This is the most well thought out, and well written article I've read on Islam to date. In some ways the author confirms my belief that the major difference between Christianity and Islam is that Christians have grown, and evolved, where Islamists are saddled with a belief system that doesn't fit our time.
I have read postings here claiming the Koran is a violent document and a blueprint for terror. And yet, I know the Bible has it's own violent passages, and puzzling content. We, Christians, have grown enough that we can look past some of the literal interpretations, and focus on the good. Unlike those who, in more primative times, used the Bible to justify things such as witch hunts and the Crusades.
Sadly, the biggest thing missing in this article is a solution.


13 posted on 03/30/2005 9:40:13 AM PST by brownsfan (Post No Bills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

I've noticed the parallels and connections between militant islamism and marxism. It seems counter-intuitive, but only if you see islamism as primarily a religious movement. It isn't, its a revolutionary movement, and it is more anti-western than it is religious.


16 posted on 03/30/2005 9:46:44 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

It may shock most of you to learn the author is a leader in the Intelligent Design community.


17 posted on 03/30/2005 10:00:17 AM PST by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin; GOP_1900AD; maui_hawaii; ALOHA RONNIE; Alamo-Girl; kristinn; doug from upland; JohnHuang2; ..
Thanks...useful. Medved could learn a thing or two from this guy ( he tends to dismiss the connections between movements).

Pinging.

22 posted on 03/30/2005 1:39:45 PM PST by Paul Ross (We have sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson