Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591

Per Sekulow on Sean's radion show, maybe Fridayish, an actual DE NOVO would actually take 2-3 months, so to me, the reinsertion would be a no-brainer. Perhaps that's why it didn't occur to the Senate to specify that.


478 posted on 03/29/2005 11:04:49 PM PST by oprahstheantichrist (Terri's battle is NOT against flesh and blood....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies ]


To: oprahstheantichrist
Per Sekulow on Sean's radion show, maybe Fridayish, an actual DE NOVO would actually take 2-3 months, so to me, the reinsertion would be a no-brainer. Perhaps that's why it didn't occur to the Senate to specify that. That's exactly it. I heard one of the Senators (for the life of me I can't remember which one), and he said exactly that - that in order to get a de novo review they would HAVE to reinsert it. But there was something about the language or SOMETHING, so they left it out since it was so "duh."
548 posted on 03/29/2005 11:18:48 PM PST by razorbackmama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]

To: oprahstheantichrist
I think (but am not certain) Sensenbrenner's Bill did specify it.

But it shouldn't need to be specified. Obviously, it would be pointless, at least from the standpoint of possibly saving Terri's life, to have a DENOVO hearing without the reinsertion of the feeding tube, as Terri would expire before it was completed. I truly don't understand why there would be genuine disagreement by the judges on that issue.

756 posted on 03/30/2005 12:44:05 AM PST by TAdams8591 (Evil succeeds when good men don't do enough!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson