[ArmstedFragg]

Wouldn't that have been a procedural error, for Judge Whittemore NOT to have heard it as DE NOVO, and shouldn't the 11th circuit have picked that up???

Not if it wasn't presented to them.

The original ruling was on the issue of whether an order to reconnect should be issued in a circumstance where the party asking for it is unlikely to win at trail. Whittemore said, "no", and the appellate courts agreed. Absent the reconnect order, a de novo hearing would have been moot. Here you have the question of whether Congress can, in effect, create a circumstance where he HAS to enter a reconnect order. I'm not going to make a prediction on their decision, but I'll note that an order would be unlikely to issue, in any case, until a decision has been reached. Given the circumstances, issuing an order would be, at least temporarily, the same as deciding the case.

Two days ago would have better for this.

[TAdams8591]

If the courts were to hear Terri's case as DE NOVO, wouldn't they have to order the reinsertion of the feeding tube? Otherwise it would be a MOOT point to hear it.

How can they decide Terri wouldn't win if they are basing it upon the facts as decided by Judge Greer? The whole point of the DE NOVO, was to start fresh from scratch.

It would seem that by directing a DE NOVO hearing, the reinsertion of the feeding tube is implied.