That's the pompous, irrelevant statement that gets to me the most!!! As if how many times it's been rejected has anything to do with reviewing the FACTS as requested!
They should have done this a long time ago.
I have my doubts that this will go anywhere. It wouldn't surprise me that these folks already believe they have ruled on the "facts" and not see it as a "procedural" issue. I suspect they just want this to "go away".