Posted on 03/28/2005 10:28:35 PM PST by Former Military Chick
DENVER, March 28 - In a sharply divided ruling, Colorado's highest court on Monday upheld a lower court's decision throwing out the sentence of a man who was given the death penalty after jurors consulted the Bible in reaching a verdict. The Bible, the court said, constituted an improper outside influence and a reliance on what the court called a "higher authority."
"The judicial system works very hard to emphasize the rarified, solemn and sequestered nature of jury deliberations," the majority said in a 3-to-2 decision by a panel of the Colorado Supreme Court. "Jurors must deliberate in that atmosphere without the aid or distraction of extraneous texts."
The ruling involved the conviction of Robert Harlan, who was found guilty in 1995 of raping and murdering a cocktail waitress near Denver. After Mr. Harlan's conviction, the judge in the case - as Colorado law requires - sent the jury off to deliberate about the death penalty with an instruction to think beyond the narrow confines of the law. Each juror, the judge told the panel, must make an "individual moral assessment," in deciding whether Mr. Harlan should live.
The jurors voted unanimously for death. The State Supreme Court's decision changes that sentence to life in prison without parole.
In the decision on Monday, the dissenting judges said the majority had confused the internal codes of right and wrong that juries are expected to possess in such weighty moral matters with the outside influences that are always to be avoided, like newspaper articles or television programs about the case. The jurors consulted Bibles, the minority said, not to look for facts or alternative legal interpretations, but for wisdom.
"The biblical passages the jurors discussed constituted either a part of the jurors' moral and religious precepts or their general knowledge, and thus were relevant to their court-sanctioned moral assessment," the minority wrote.
Legal experts said that Colorado was unusual in its language requiring jurors in capital felony cases to explicitly consult a moral compass. Most states that have restored the death penalty weave in a discussion of moral factors, lawyers said, along with the burden that jurors must decide whether aggravating factors outweigh mitigating factors in voting on execution.
"In Colorado it's a more distinct instruction," said Bob Grant, who was the prosecutor in the Harlan case. Mr. Grant said no decision had been made yet on whether to appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
Legal scholars say the connection between hard legal logic and the softer, deeper world of values is always present in jury rooms, whether acknowledged or not.
"The court says we're asking you to be moral men and women, to make a moral judgment of the right thing to do," said Thane Rosenbaum, a professor of law at Fordham University School of Law in New York City, and author of the book "The Myth of Moral Justice: Why Our Legal System Fails to Do What's Right" (HarperCollins, 2004). "But then we say the juror cheated because he brought in a book that forms the basis of his moral universe," Professor Rosenbaum said. "The thing is, he would have done it anyway, in his head."
Other legal experts say the Colorado decision touches on an issue that courts do not like to talk about: that jurors, under traditions dating to the days of English common law, can consider higher authority all they want, and can convict or acquit using whatever internal thoughts and discussions they consider appropriate.
In this instance, lawyers said, there was simply a clearer trail of evidence, with admissions by the jurors during Mr. Harlan's appeal that Bibles had been used in their discussion. One juror testified she studied Romans and Leviticus, including Leviticus 24, which includes the famous articulation of Old Testament justice: "eye for eye, tooth for tooth."
Professor Howard J. Vogel, who teaches ethics at Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul and has a master's degree in theology as well as a law degree, said, "I don't think it's a religious text that's the problem here, but rather whether something is being used that trumps the law of the state."
The Bible is hardly monolithic about what constitutes justice. Some legal experts say the jurors might just as easily have found guidance that led them to vote to spare Mr. Harlan's life. Lawyers for Mr. Harlan also specifically urged the jurors to consider biblical wisdom, according to the Supreme Court's decision, with a request that they find mercy in their hearts "as God ultimately took mercy on Abraham."
The lawyers also made several references to Mr. Harlan's soul and his habit of reading the Bible with his father, the court said.
Kathleen Lord, a lawyer for Mr. Harlan, did not return repeated calls.
Mr. Harlan was convicted of kidnapping a waitress, Rhonda Maloney, and raping her. She escaped and flagged down a motorist, Jaquie Creazzo. Mr. Harlan caught up with the two women, shot Ms. Creazzo, leaving her paralyzed, then beat and killed Ms. Maloney.
Says it all?
And this is why Christian parents and Sunday school teachers have children memorize bible verses.
I wonder what verses secularists would have us refer to, gangsta rap, hollyweird,liberal academian Marxists....etc..
This is neither the first time this has occurred, nor is it the last, sadly.
Here's another article about this nastiness:
Colo. Slay Case Tossed Over Bible Consult
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1372657/posts
Note this:
The Bible, the court said, constituted an improper outside influence and a reliance on what the court called a "higher authority."
So what authority are people allowed to use? Whose authority? This is so transparently evil it's amazing how shameless they are.
Judges are out of control.
Yes, we mustn't undercut the authority of the courts. /sarcasm
What's worse?
murder, rape, and removing bodily functions from another human, or defaming the courts and seeking a hire power for guidance for crying out loud!
No wonder this became an issue for the judges must be outraged at the lack of respect for the bench!
There is an abence of justice in this country and the absence is wearing us down... I think that's what they want. A Country
without order or justice ; a Country where the meaning of the word is is always a point of contention. God Help us...
The Colorado Supreme Court?
Or are they just doing a preemptive strike against jury nullification, which relies on belief in a higher authority, be it sacred or secular?
Well said SJ.
The more I see about our judges the more I realize how broken our system of justice is. The laws are made by lawyers for lawyers and then the judges are almost all lawyers to boot. The cronyism of the courthouse is well known by those of us who must suffer under it's dictates and the high cost of justice. They are some of the main reasons that our forefathers rebelled against the British.
What if they had consulted that koran book?
This is a good case for the death penalty. Unfortunately, a juror looking for "wisdom" did not use his head, and the result is that the death penalty got thrown out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.