I understand why someone would be upset, but it is misplaced anger. It is not the protestors who are the problem here.
Instead, she should be angry that a corrupt judge has sentenced a disabled woman to death by starvation.
with all due respect.....the judge didn't order them there.....it was media driven but also the chaos of the protestors as well........it became a feeding frenzy by Sunday with Communist groups moving in and Randall Terry bullhorning his way to more lunacy
Absolutely.
I believe we will have to agree to disagree. What every I might say will be ignored. Glad that you took the time to read the article and post a comment, though.
Then go protest at the courthouse - not at the hospice!
Echo my agreement to your comments above ...
Sorry. You're wrong. The protesters are responsible for the harm done to this innocent bystander - no one else.
Instead, she should be angry that a corrupt judge has sentenced a disabled woman to death by starvation.
No, she should be angry with the protesters of whom too many have been totally obnoxious, and have held up disgusting signs. I feel so sorry for those who have loved ones in that hospice at this particular time.
You're absolutely right. The protesters are not responsible for their actions. The judge made them act in such a boorish and reprehensible fashion. We must try to understand why they would behave this way. Why, it's just the same understanding we must show towards people who commit murder or other violent crimes. We must understand that violent criminals all had horrible childhoods, which can be traced directly to the failed policies of the Reagan and Bush administrations, tax cuts for the wealthy on the backs of the poor, all that sort of thing.
Honestly, some of you people act as though you've entered a parallel universe.