What do you base this rash assessment on?
1. It is not rash - that would imply I have never read or heard Abrams.
2. It's one of those little things that, well.. You actually have it explained to you, you're too young.
What's your opinion. You think it is OK to starve people to death to end their life?
Abrams is not a good man.
You ask "What do you base this rash assessment on?", that Abrams is "not a good man."
Try that he is using his public influence in proposing the murder of a woman by courts which allow a man who has been with another woman since 1996 to make her decsions. He is murdering Terri, as much as Michael is, if not even worse in that he had the ability to study morality, and instead speaks contrary to right and wrong.
He had the opportunities "to learn justice, and mercy and walking humbly with his God", which is what Scripture says God wants, and instead he slaps God in the face by wanting to murder Terri Schiavo by dehydration.
Wolf in lamb's clothing...
Well, the alternative is that he's a good man. So, by what definition of "good" does a good man go on television night after night applauding the murder of an innocent woman?
Are you Gen-X?