Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Redcloak
What they mean is that during 98% of 2004, there were known, unpatched vulnerabilities in IE. This is being somewhat charitable. The flaws in question were there in 2003, 2002, 2001... and so on. (And, there are flaws that were not patched at all simply because they've yet to be discovered.) They report that there was only one, brief period when there were no known, unpatched flaws. Again, this is being charitable. They are assuming that since the IT community at large did not know about the flaws, no hackers did either.

We need to find that 2% and see what they did right... but I have a sinking feeling that it was the cumulative 7.3 days (365 x 2%) after all the security updates and before the hackers found the next hole in IE!

11 posted on 03/28/2005 8:04:35 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

IIRC, the 2% happened during the spring break period; e.i. the geeks were off getting hammered rather than hunting for bugs.


12 posted on 03/28/2005 8:06:55 PM PST by Redcloak (But what do I know? I'm just a right-wing nut in his PJs whackin' on a keyboard..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson