Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle
Harlan’s attorneys challenged the sentence after discovering five jurors had looked up Bible verses, copied some of them down and then talked about them behind closed doors.

Something about the wording of this sentence looks odd to me. There is nothing in the article that says these jurors actually brought anything into the jury deliberation room -- just that they "copied them down" and "talked about them behind closed doors."

I'm wondering if there's more (or less) to this than meets the eye.

52 posted on 03/28/2005 1:01:16 PM PST by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Something about the wording of this sentence looks odd to me. There is nothing in the article that says these jurors actually brought anything into the jury deliberation room -- just that they "copied them down" and "talked about them behind closed doors."

Well, if they brought notes from the outside from any source to help them decide the case, they were breaking the rules.
152 posted on 03/28/2005 4:18:50 PM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson