He could probably claim that he did NOT know that it was illegal to look at porn on company time because no one ever told him as such. He probably thought that "sexual freedom" gave him official cover.
he did NOT know that it was illegal to look at CHILD porn
Big difference in those two statements.
Well sexual freedom just HAS to be in the Constitution... WHAT? You're kidding... oh well, it is a "living breating doucment" ya know. I'm sure that's what they meant by "domestic tranquility"... all those old white dudes had sex ya know. Everybody does it ya know... /sarcasm