Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dwilli
She was being fed through a feeding tube, not an IV. Big, big difference, because a feeding tube is much lower-maintenance. And her husband refused to allow any swallowing evaluations to see if she had the ability to at least drink liquids without the need for such a tube.
26 posted on 03/28/2005 11:33:41 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: inquest

So it's artificial nourishment rather than intravenous.
Has she eaten orally since her collapse? Don't you suppose
that nursing staff have at least tried ice cream or baby
food in 16 years?


28 posted on 03/28/2005 11:37:14 AM PST by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson