Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest

So it's artificial nourishment rather than intravenous.
Has she eaten orally since her collapse? Don't you suppose
that nursing staff have at least tried ice cream or baby
food in 16 years?


28 posted on 03/28/2005 11:37:14 AM PST by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: dwilli
I believe (as far as I can remember) they have been forbidden to offer her anything by mouth.

Which is interesting, because you are supposed to do swallow studies intermittently with tube feeders. BUT, since she has been in Hospice (forever) all the SOP's of long term care don't apply.
33 posted on 03/28/2005 11:44:09 AM PST by najida (I wish I had Tina Turner's legs, Ann Coulter's brains and Paris Hilton's credit cards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: dwilli
So it's artificial nourishment rather than intravenous.

You could put it that way, I suppose, but it's hardly the same thing as being hooked up to a machine. You could feed a person through an NG tube just by manually pouring the nutrients into a funnel. Her parents have been more than willing to take care of her that way.

Has she eaten orally since her collapse? Don't you suppose that nursing staff have at least tried ice cream or baby food in 16 years?

I don't know the full details of her care. I only know that her husband has refused (formal) swallowing evaluations on her. What the nurses might have done off the side and off the record is anyone's guess.

37 posted on 03/28/2005 11:50:47 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson