FYI and discussion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Momaw Nadon

We're doomed. Doomed! DOOMED!!!
2 posted on
03/28/2005 4:52:09 AM PST by
Petronski
(If Reichskanzler Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
To: Momaw Nadon
I'm confident that we will all starve to death long before we run out of oil. Paul Ehrlich has done the research, and he says we're gonna run out of food any day now. So this oil thing is no big deal.
3 posted on
03/28/2005 4:52:26 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: Momaw Nadon
It has been very hard for Americans -- lost in dark raptures of nonstop infotainment, recreational shopping and compulsive motoringOooh, bad, BAD Americans!
4 posted on
03/28/2005 4:55:01 AM PST by
Jim Noble
To: Momaw Nadon
The more the price of oil goes up the more economical other methods of extraction become. There are literally trillions of barrels of recoverable oil out there we just need to have a reason to get it. Previously the price of the commodity did not justify the expense.
6 posted on
03/28/2005 4:59:19 AM PST by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: Momaw Nadon
"FYI and discussion." Ridiculous tripe. Obviously the author has been indulging in the other activity that denizens of "Rolling Stone" magazine are prone to----taking too many recreational drugs and frying his brain.
To: Momaw Nadon
Nothing but hyperbole that assumes any thing that may have happened in the past is therefore an inescapable trend that will repeat in the future.
One example is that our production is down and our consumption is up.He acts as if there is no solution to this inequity and because that is the situation we have now it will be that way forever.He fails to admit or see that the situation arose because of policy choices we made.It can be reversed by more exploration and development of nuclear plants.
The truth probably is that he does`nt like the solutions and to obscure the facts wants people to believe there are no answers.
Very disingenuous.
8 posted on
03/28/2005 5:06:15 AM PST by
carlr
To: Momaw Nadon
First of all, anything from Rolling Stone is going to say "run in circles, scream and shout!", so consider the source.
I do believe that we need to maximize our use of oil by voluntarily choosing more fuel-efficient vehicles whenever possible.
My little 2.3-liter 4-cylinder Ford Ranger gets about 25 mpg and can carry half a ton, and it's fun to drive. As a contrast, my old Yamaha 2-stroke streetbike only has 346 cc displacement and gets...about 25 mpg.
10 posted on
03/28/2005 5:11:02 AM PST by
Sender
(Team Infidel USA)
To: Momaw Nadon
The Pacific Northwest, New England and the Upper Midwest have somewhat better prospects. I regard them as less likely to fall into lawlessness, anarchy or despotism and more likely to salvage the bits and pieces of our best social traditions and keep them in operation at some level.Is he referring to NASCAR?
There's a great track right here in New Hampshire.
To: Momaw Nadon
Rolling Stone meets expectations once again. What a bunch of shlock!
13 posted on
03/28/2005 5:19:36 AM PST by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: Momaw Nadon
'The other way to get hydrogen in the quantities wished for would be electrolysis of water using power from hundreds of nuclear plants.'
Sounds like the way to go to me. If someone who actually knows what he is talking about here could comment, I would be grateful to be educated about the technological feasibility of nuclear electrolysis.
--
14 posted on
03/28/2005 5:28:15 AM PST by
nathanbedford
(The UN was bribed and Good Men Died)
To: Momaw Nadon
One thing this article does bring up for me. We really should start to build more nuclear power plants.
15 posted on
03/28/2005 5:35:10 AM PST by
Bones75
To: Momaw Nadon
"The result was that just about every power plant built after 1980 has to run on gas."Demonstrably false. My Dad, who was involved in the construction and startup of several new coal-fired and geothermal power plants around the USA over the last 20+ years might beg to differ.
16 posted on
03/28/2005 5:40:01 AM PST by
SW6906
To: Momaw Nadon
The latent encoded behavior of Southern culture includes an outsized notion of individualism and the belief that firearms ought to be used in the defense of it. This is a poor recipe for civic cohesion. So East Detroit, the South Bronx, and South Central Los Angeles are criminal hellholes because of the "latent encoded behavior of Southern culture"? Who knew?
Somebody is going to be using guns to take what they want when the power goes out, but the evidence suggests it isn't going to be Southern Pentecostal Christians. ;)
To: Momaw Nadon
Let the handwringing begin!
Seriously, the left just cannot bring itself to acknowledge the ability of the market to provide supply where there is a demand. The only question is cost.
In truth we are living in an ocean of hydrocarbons which can be converted, and are being converted by existing technologies, into forms that are suitable for various needs.
Canada's oil sands contain almost as much in hydrocarbons as Saudi oil contains.
The US has a Saudi-sized amount of oil in the form of oil shale deposits, not to mention the several centuries supply of coal we have.
At this very moment, a plant in Carthage, Missouri is turning tons of organic waste from a nearby turkey processing plant into oil. The process generates 8x the energy it consumes. The closed process is non-polluting.
see:
http://www.changingworldtech.com/information_center/faq.asp#8
A experimental plant using this process successfully runs on muncipal waste and sewage solids. It is has been estimated that this technology could recover enough hydrocarbons from domestic wastes to replace all oil imports.
Again, the only issue is cost.
Be wary of people bringing an alarming worry who also insist on solving a problem by increasing the size of government and reducing your rights to choose what you can buy, where you can live, and how you live your life.
To: Momaw Nadon
21 posted on
03/28/2005 6:06:48 AM PST by
Brett66
(W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1)
To: Momaw Nadon
I love that gratuitous little political shot he takes at the end there, stating that the liberals areas of the country are going to cope with his imagined Malthusian catastrophe better than the conservative areas.
26 posted on
03/28/2005 6:25:10 AM PST by
jpl
(The Deathocrats are a bigger threat to our society than the Islamic terrorists.)
To: Momaw Nadon
I wish folks on FR wouold stop posting this discredited crap.
To: Momaw Nadon
Except for the factual time-line, this could have been published in 1972.
Overall, excluding the main premise, the piece is very factual and inciteful. Our economy right down to the agricultural sector depends on abundant, cheap oil. Our free republic depends on a fluid economy with opportunity for all and the promises of economic freedom and personal economic security. A compromised economy puts enormous pressures on our system of government and social tranquility. Failure to consider this would be fatal for our way of life and be the destruction of our nation and Constitution.
To: Momaw Nadon
When ever I want to know what's going on in the oil patch, I turn to Rolling Stone.
To: Momaw Nadon
You can make synthetic oil from coal, but the only time this was tried on a large scale was by the Nazis under wartime conditions, using impressive amounts of slave labor.
Wonder why he chose to throw this tidbit in? And didn't South Africa do the same thing during sanctions?
32 posted on
03/28/2005 6:38:41 AM PST by
somniferum
(All warfare is deception - Sun Tzu)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson